Not sure if you're being intentionally obtuse, or if it's unintentional. Either way, we both know your sad attempts to mock me are because you are incapable of forming a substantive rebuttal to a single point I've made in this thread.
Russia invaded Ukraine and then held a "referendum". There will never be any serious (majority or otherwise) international recognition of that. It really is that simple.
And your talk of peace talks is utter nonsense as usual. Putin's mumbling about peace talks because he's losing. But there's unlikely to be any agreement, for the following reasons:
- Russia will insist on a ceasefire while "peace talks" take place because it is losing, which Ukraine won't accept (and shouldn't)
- Ukraine will insist (rightly) on the return of all their land and people, which Russia could absolutely accept but Putin cannot
- Ukraine will also insist on joining some kind of security alliance with the west, which Putin can't accept because "peace talks" are nothing but a delay-and-rebuild-your-army tactic for him.
There's probably a dozen other impasses but those will be the early sticking points.
If Russia withdraws from Ukraine the "peace talks" will begin quite naturally after that. Otherwise, the war will continue. On its present trajectory it might drag on for years, but eventually Russia will be forced out. It's possible at some point they will grind Ukraine to a stalemate, at which point Ukraine might be willing to negotiate.
A complete Russian military collapse is another unlikely scenario that's probably, nevertheless, more likely than a stalemate.
But until such time as Ukraine wants to negotiate, nobody from the west should be trying to force them into it. And Russia's absolutely in no position to do so.