Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post
If Rashford was not interfering with play in that position he bloody well should have been. It was a bonkers decision, it should never have stood.

Next up a goal will be disallowed because a toe nail is not in line. Who is making this $hit up?
The problem is that there are now precise definitions of what interfering with play consists of, and Rashford did not do any of those things. Thus the ref was perfectly correct, according to the current laws, to allow the goal. That the law is an ass is irrefutable, but that's not the refs fault.