Covid vaccinations - the legacy?

[sinkov]

I've explained it often enough, if you haven't got it yet you never will, I no longer have any interest in discussions with vaccine propagandists such as your good self.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

I've explained it often enough, if you haven't got it yet you never will, I no longer have any interest in discussions with vaccine propagandists such as your good self.

Remind me again which one of us got the jab? And another jab and then a booster jab.

Not me mon ami.

[sinkov]

There was no reason not to initially, and there were very good personal reasons for the first three, of which you know nothing. Once it became apparent that we were being lied to about vaccines, that was the end of them for me. All of which has no relevance to your recent switching of support to the vaccine zealots. Never thought you'd be onside with the likes of Hancock, Sunak, hundreds of scumbag MPs, Big Pharma, the Mad Scientists of Sage and our corrupted media. Are they paying you as well ?

[kritichris]

I've just made 70 and have now been invited to have a shingles jab, any conspiracy theories or scientific evidence to suggest I shouldn't have it?

[Norder]

.

I've just made 70 and have now been invited to have a shingles jab, any conspiracy theories or scientific evidence to suggest I shouldn't have it?

you could pretend your 69 (or younger), Kritti.....so are deemed to have a healthy enough immune system so as not to need one, or, you could pretend to be over 79, that age group being considered to have too weak an immune system to be worthy of it. Then perhaps there's no need to pretend, in that You determine it to be unnecessary.


Also, from what I read, there's 2 shingles vaccines on offer, Zostavax , a live vaccine. 1 dose, and Shingrix, non-live 2 dose.

....after a court case (2020) it seems that Zostovax is no longer sold in the U.S.

Merck escapes nearly 1,200 Zostavax shingles vaccine lawsuits

https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/...intiffs-expert

as for Shingrix, it a recombinant DNA altered genetically engineered creation,

Side Effects.

https://www.healthline.com/health/sh...e-side-effects


....hope that wasn't painful.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

There was no reason not to initially, and there were very good personal reasons for the first three, of which you know nothing. Once it became apparent that we were being lied to about vaccines, that was the end of them for me. All of which has no relevance to your recent switching of support to the vaccine zealots. Never thought you'd be onside with the likes of Hancock, Sunak, hundreds of scumbag MPs, Big Pharma, the Mad Scientists of Sage and our corrupted media. Are they paying you as well ?

I really have no idea how you have been railroaded to make this rather daft conclusion. From day one I was anti-vax, I just fail to see how Brigden's comparison to the extermination of 14 million people in Nazi death camps can equate to a Covid vaccination programme.

Any contemporary politician who uses the Holocaust to score political points is a f*cking eejit and he was vaccinated to boot.

The man is a political retard and I'm amazed you are standing in his corner.

It must be the height of hypocrisy to get vaccinated and then blame the government for rolling out a vaccination programme, but then again the Tories have never known their arse from their elbow.

[sinkov]

You pick your side mon ami, I can understand MPs wanting to close down debate on vaccine harms, they pushed them, they told us they were safe, they told us they prevented infection, they told us they prevented transmission, they put people out of work in the Care Sector on that basis, there is now a crisis in the NHS as a result of the subsequent bed-blocking, there are thousands of excess deaths, probably as a result of the vaccines they have spent billions of pounds on. They are attempting to prevent any discussion or investigation of the harms vaccines are causing, of course they are, they can never, and will never admit to any culpability for this unmitigated disaster, so it's perfectly understandable that they will pile in and close down any and all debate on vaccine harms. So I understand exactly where they are coming from, and why they are doing it, they have to do it to save their own skins, but why are you taking their side, what's your excuse ?

You are aware, I presume, of whose side you are taking on this, vile, lying, corrupt scumbag MPS, the majority of whom I wouldn't piss on if they were on fire, beneath contempt, utter scum, but you're lining up alongside this scum.

Why is this, why are you sleeping with the enemy, so to speak ?

[sinkov]

"EXCLUSIVE: Pfizer's secret guide for how to make a vaccine "safe and effective"
It is so easy. Here's how they did it."


"Here’s Pfizer’s secret playbook for how to make a “safe and effective” vaccine:

Require full liability protection

Contracts require that the government isn’t allowed to reveal any adverse safety information without Pfizer’s express consent

Get the US government to agree that there will not be any ICD10 codes for:

Death of a fully vaxxed person from COVID

Death from the COVID vaccine

Injury from the COVID vaccine

Avoid debating anyone who figures out the truth

Make sure the medical journals only publish articles favorable to the vaccine. If there are any criticisms, ignore them.

Criticize anyone who speaks out against the vaccines as “anti-science”

Forbid doctors to speak negatively about the vaccine to their patients (e.g., CA AB2098)

Punish doctors who tell the truth: fire them, strip them of their medical license, censor them, deplatform them, demonetize their channels, etc.

Make sure the mainstream media is telling a consistent narrative by creating the “Trusted News Initiative”

It’s really that simple. And I wish I was kidding. You can’t make this stuff up. It’s all true.

Note
The excuse for not having those ICD10 codes listed above is simple: there is no need for such codes since these events are not possible.

I can assure you, the vaccine injured requested the codes be added, but they were denied. So today, you cannot die from COVID if you’ve been vaccinated and the vaccines don’t injure or kill people. That’s how science works."

[The Bedlington Terrier]

You pick your side mon ami, I can understand MPs wanting to close down debate on vaccine harms, they pushed them, they told us they were safe, they told us they prevented infection, they told us they prevented transmission, they put people out of work in the Care Sector on that basis, there is now a crisis in the NHS as a result of the subsequent bed-blocking, there are thousands of excess deaths, probably as a result of the vaccines they have spent billions of pounds on. They are attempting to prevent any discussion or investigation of the harms vaccines are causing, of course they are, they can never, and will never admit to any culpability for this unmitigated disaster, so it's perfectly understandable that they will pile in and close down any and all debate on vaccine harms. So I understand exactly where they are coming from, and why they are doing it, they have to do it to save their own skins, but why are you taking their side, what's your excuse ?

You are aware, I presume, of whose side you are taking on this, vile, lying, corrupt scumbag MPS, the majority of whom I wouldn't piss on if they were on fire, beneath contempt, utter scum, but you're lining up alongside this scum.

Why is this, why are you sleeping with the enemy, so to speak ?

I'm stopping banging my head on a brick wall with you now sinkov.

The lockdown, the coercion and control, the pressure to vaccinate, the "eat out to help out" lunacy was all bonkers to me.

The lemmings jumping off cliffs to get vaccinated, getting vaccinated just to get on a plane was bonkers. I have said it enough.

My whole point on this little dispute is how your mate Brigden correlates a jab in the arm to Hitler's fascists chucking truck loads of Jews into cattle trucks to gas them in Auschwitz. I just don't see it. It's offensive, it's anti-Semitic and if he wants to get his knickers in a twist perhaps he could turn his attention to the 25000 people who currently die every day because of hunger. That's over 9 million people dying across the globe through starvation every year. The Holocaust pales in comparison. The end.

[sinkov]

But he said no such thing, he pointed out that an eminent cardiologist had said it. Was the cardiologist exaggerating, or are the vaccines causing a staggering loss of life worldwide ? Whoa, don't even go there, chuck a dead cat on the table, we don't want to be to be discussing vaccine harms. Let's talk about non-existent anti-semitism instead.

It's simple mon ami, what is offensive is that people are dying and being seriously injured due to the vaccines, and government here and also in the US, try to close down what little debate there is and ignore the victims. What is offensive is that no one is harmed by a word, not even the word holocaust, but people are being harmed by the vaccines, but the ****s don't want to know.

You keep sitting alongside your mate Matt Hancock on this one mon ami, I'll stay well away if you don't mind.