Quote Originally Posted by stewarty27 View Post
Sturgeon actually said their concerns were "not valid" What give's her the right to say What and what's not valid ?. Mason you have continually missed the point concerning thousands of Women the UN and groups all over the wurld concerns and fears against the GRA more particular elements within the bill.. THEY ARE MOST DEFINETLY VALID !! This legislation opens the door to predatory men to gain access to women's spaces, Now please listen to this... I have said time and time again I am not against the GRA bill per say. Its long needed updated but its a fact dangerous elements have been left in that can and WILL be exploited by devious *** offenders ..not Trans people *** offenders. It not only sets back Women's right but also genuine Trans people gay and lesbian folk.
It doesn’t matter how many times you say it, or even IF YOU TYPE IT IN CAPS. They’re not valid. There’s zero evidence to back it up & the folk complaining the most are honking transphobes. I don’t even think most of the Tories that voted against it at Westminster believe it. Yer Lee Andersons & Scott Benton’s do obviously but they’re halfwits