You keep saying that but it doesn’t make it true. What about all the women that support they bill, are they all wrong? What rights specifically does this bill infringe on? Go for it
Well I don't think its as simple as that. Sure the GRA was in the manifesto but certainly not in the form it was voted through, When Women members of the SNP said wait a minute this clashes with Womens rights Sturgeon called for yet another consultation which happened ... She then went on to totally ignore the concerns raised calling them "not valid" worse was to follow when she called these Women "Bigots and "Transphobes"
She was warned time and time again the bill in its current for was unworkable and how it dangerously impinged on others rights it also clashed with the current human rights act.. So it was obvious the UK Gov were going to raise section 35 of the Scotland act., One thing Sturgeon is not is daft she knew it would happen.
An unjust law is no law at all said Martin luther King. Sturgeon fvcked up big time and turn a just law into a joke I'll say in again She was warned
Last edited by stewarty27; 20-02-2023 at 04:46 PM.
You keep saying that but it doesn’t make it true. What about all the women that support they bill, are they all wrong? What rights specifically does this bill infringe on? Go for it
Oh Joy Angus H Robertson not standing for leader.
I see that Kate Forbes has now said a few things that will put clear blue water between her and Youaf. Some of her comments
She would be loathe to challenge the UK Government on blocking the GRR Bill
She has significant concerns about the GRR bill in its current form and wouldn't have voted for it
She said "I don't think self identification is sufficient"
She would engage with the UK Government to see what changes are needed to make the Bill compatible with UK equalaties legislation
Let battle commence!!! (if she wins it would seem that the deal with the Greens would not likely survive given this is a red line item for them)