+ Visit Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 173 of 212 FirstFirst ... 73123163171172173174175183 ... LastLast
Results 1,721 to 1,730 of 2114

Thread: Sturgeonland

  1. #1721
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,917
    Quote Originally Posted by donsdaft View Post
    Actually, people want to be lied to, the bigger the lie the better.
    Why else would Boris have been popular?
    Exactly my point. People don't want the truth.

    Hence why we got lumbered with Brexit and Boris/Liz/Rishi.

    We need to educate people on the importance of taxation and a tax system fit for purpose.

    You can argue black is white all day long. You don't have a fair tax system, you won't have a fair society.

  2. #1722
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,951
    I've always thought that the biggest problem with politics and politicians is they are always thinking about how they win the next election/retain their seat therefore they do/say popular things (including lying) that is best for them and their next election hopes rather than what is best for the country. One example - how long have we shied away from fixing social care for elderly because all politicians are too scared to tackle it and look now at the knock on impact on the NHS via bed blocking.

    So my fix is one-term only for politicians so they do what is right rather than what is popular. The continuity of knowledge/experience then comes from officials. This also has the advantage of doing away with career politicians who have little or no knowledge of how the real world works. All politicians will then likely have had a real job before they become politicians for their five/six year stint.

  3. #1723
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Red Zone View Post
    I've always thought that the biggest problem with politics and politicians is they are always thinking about how they win the next election/retain their seat therefore they do/say popular things (including lying) that is best for them and their next election hopes rather than what is best for the country. One example - how long have we shied away from fixing social care for elderly because all politicians are too scared to tackle it and look now at the knock on impact on the NHS via bed blocking.

    So my fix is one-term only for politicians so they do what is right rather than what is popular. The continuity of knowledge/experience then comes from officials. This also has the advantage of doing away with career politicians who have little or no knowledge of how the real world works. All politicians will then likely have had a real job before they become politicians for their five/six year stint.
    I'd agree with that, although I say two terms.

    I'd also only have people from an area or stayed in an area for a set number of years able to stand in that area.

    There has been a huge brain drain from the public sector across the past few decades. That really needs fixing for the UK as a whole and especially in the devolved nations.

    I'd happily get rid of political parties and career politicians.

  4. #1724
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    21,494
    Lessons from History here.

    We might even get some sort of agreement.

    2 terms fine but not consecutively, they must do something in the outside world in between.

    Preferably they have experience of life outside politics before their first term too.

  5. #1725
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    17,112
    You can all dream on. Westminster and Holyrood are legislatures.

    Do you honestly think that the fellating/gash-tonguing careerists are going to pass laws to endanger their own well-feathered nests?

    No, me neither.

  6. #1726
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,452
    Quote Originally Posted by 57vintage View Post
    You can all dream on. Westminster and Holyrood are legislatures.

    Do you honestly think that the fellating/gash-tonguing careerists are going to pass laws to endanger their own well-feathered nests?

    No, me neither.
    No they won't but they can fμck right off:

    https://salvo.scot/claim-of-right/

  7. #1727
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    1,658
    Quote Originally Posted by Donanddusted View Post
    No they won't but they can fμck right off:

    https://salvo.scot/claim-of-right/
    Very amusing. A quick glance at the Salvo website reminds me of something along the lines that elderly Englishman, Captain Calamity (aka Stuart Hill), who was shipwrecked on our shores (well - washed ashore in a glorified bath tub) around 20 years ago would write - completely unsubstantiated drivel and with few authorities for the claims that are made. You have to be very careful what you read on the net.

  8. #1728
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,857
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDeeDon View Post
    Thought about your armed forces comment and still not getting it.

    I do believe you could well be a hun troll.
    Not getting it ??? If Scotland were independent how would it defend itself outside the UK and NATO, because if Faslane were to be shut down NATO would not accept that as it houses the UK nuclear detterent.

  9. #1729
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    21,494
    Nato can do what they're told.

    The UK would be no more, england can fück off and play with their nuclear weapons.

  10. #1730
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,452
    Quote Originally Posted by Shetland Don View Post
    You have to be very careful what you read on the net.
    Indeed you do.

Page 173 of 212 FirstFirst ... 73123163171172173174175183 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •