+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 82

Thread: Macca to Leicester?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    14,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Moreton_Pie View Post
    I would like to think that these clubs are a but more astute. Mecca we t hiding in the games against Wrexham Away, Boreham Wood and Chesterfield. He will be man marked now and when he is, he isn't the goalscorer that he was. There will be a better class of defender even if he stays with us. They should all wait another season TBF.
    While he did dry up over the last few games I wouldn't say he went missing. The opposition closed him down and we very rarely got the ball into the right place for him (a foretaste of L2?). His game is based on running onto a ball and we were forced into a possession game around the edges of a packed defensive third. Couldn't fault his work rate trying though.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    35,943
    Quote Originally Posted by SmiffyPie View Post
    While he did dry up over the last few games I wouldn't say he went missing. The opposition closed him down and we very rarely got the ball into the right place for him (a foretaste of L2?). His game is based on running onto a ball and we were forced into a possession game around the edges of a packed defensive third. Couldn't fault his work rate trying though.
    Agree. Wrexham did a really good job of nullifying our main attacking threat which was crosses from the wing backs, and remember Boreham Wood had the best defensive record in the division. If Macca doesn't get the service he still works hard.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    1,431
    Quote Originally Posted by SmiffyPie View Post
    While he did dry up over the last few games I wouldn't say he went missing. The opposition closed him down and we very rarely got the ball into the right place for him (a foretaste of L2?). His game is based on running onto a ball and we were forced into a possession game around the edges of a packed defensive third. Couldn't fault his work rate trying though.
    This. I really hope we can keep him because I think he's another with a top notch attitude. However, we did struggle for shots on target at the end of the season and in the playoffs. Whether that's down to other teams sussing out LW's style, or just us not being able to overcome 10 players behind the ball playing a quick press, OR a dip in form from ML and RR, or all of the above, it's hard to say exactly.

    LW is such an exciting manager right now. With Macca, or with the money from Macca's sale, t's going to be hugely interesting to see how and what Williams does next season.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    6,937
    Quote Originally Posted by SmiffyPie View Post
    While he did dry up over the last few games I wouldn't say he went missing. The opposition closed him down and we very rarely got the ball into the right place for him (a foretaste of L2?). His game is based on running onto a ball and we were forced into a possession game around the edges of a packed defensive third. Couldn't fault his work rate trying though.

    This. It's easy to say a player went missing but there is more to it than that. Are/were they carrying an injury? Also we are talking the end of a long grueling record breaking season going toe to toe with Wrexham and compounded fatigued surely has to be considered? Secondly having watched the Wembley Final again in a less heighted stressed state and knowing the result the level of service that Macauley Langstaff received that day was minimal. It was also similar in the Wrexham game and Boreham Wood. If the opposition can cut the supply line out to the front man who operates in the box then they are going to get little service and little opportunities to score.

    Kyle Wootton has scored 14 goals in 41 appearances for Stockport in League Two this season. Last season he scored 19 goals for us and the season before 15 goals. So the step up on the face of it between NL and EFL L2 for exceptional teams like us and Wrexham means we should be competitive. It also means strikers being able to get the service should still be able to produce the goods.

    Time will tell but for me Macauley Langstaff is a natural goal scorer and providing we can adjust to the level we will be playing at by giving him the service to outwit league two defence's then there is no reason for me that he can't be a 20 goal a season striker in league two. Although when you've scored 32 goals in tier 6 and 42 goals in tier 5 then what's to say he can't battle it out with Paul Mullin who scored 37 last time out in League Two?

    It's going to be about the quality of service for me, not Maccas ability.

    The rumour to Leicester is an easy one for anyone to make up especially as they have just been relegated, they are in the East Midlands and the Vardy story set's it up for a potential Vardy Mark 2. As others have said I'm sure Middlesbrough and Sunderland will have been watching closely with him being a North East lad.
    Last edited by MAD_MAGPIE; 01-06-2023 at 11:00 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,879
    Quote Originally Posted by MAD_MAGPIE View Post
    Kyle Wootton has scored 14 goals in 41 appearances for Stockport in League Two this season. Last season he scored 19 goals for us and the season before 15 goals. So the step up on the face of it between NL and EFL L2 for exceptional teams like us and Wrexham means we should be competitive. It also means strikers being able to get the service should still be able to produce the goods.
    I would also say there is a side to Kyle's game I think that was missed this season, from defending set pieces, corners etc, certainly not a strong point on Langstaff's game.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    4,419
    Quote Originally Posted by keldsyke View Post
    i would also say there is a side to kyle's game i think that was missed this season, from defending set pieces, corners etc, certainly not a strong point on langstaff's game.
    a somewhat ‘negative’ comment!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,879
    Quote Originally Posted by BanjoPie View Post
    a somewhat ‘negative’ comment!
    'Informed comment' I'd say

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,961
    Quote Originally Posted by keldsyke View Post
    'Informed comment' I'd say
    Odd way of comparing 2 strikers and I reckon we conceded less from set pieces this season than in Kyle Wootons last season at Notts?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    4,419
    Quote Originally Posted by keldsyke View Post
    'Informed comment' I'd say
    Negative comment against Langstaff because I remember LW stating that he was not allowed in our box to defend corners etc, his place was in the opponents box!. So not a very ‘informed comment’ I would say.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,879
    Quote Originally Posted by BanjoPie View Post
    Negative comment against Langstaff because I remember LW stating that he was not allowed in our box to defend corners etc, his place was in the opponents box!. So not a very ‘informed comment’ I would say.
    I know you're not the brightest on this board, but its called an opinion, don't spoil the thread trying to bait people.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •