Quote Originally Posted by Blackdogblue View Post
In the case of Blackdogblue vs Chalky.

I present to the CUFC Fans Forum where my lords the Rt Hounourables Griff and Howoldboy proceeding the facts & evidence:

Facts:
It was not Bacupclaret&blue HOW DO YOU KNOW, WHERE’S YOUR EVIDENCE?
It was not the Daughters boyfriend as they use my Amazon account because I have Prime PLEASE BRING THEM ALONG FOR CROSS-EXAMINATION
It was not Kel
The package came from Amazon and the accused has an Amazon account SO DO LOADS OF FOLK
No one else on here has my address… ITS VERY DIFFICULT TO PROVE A NEGATIVE, OVERRULED

Evidence..

Exhibit 1: the glass was engraved Non League RAFC THATS A STATEMENT OF FACT, PLEASE SUPPLY A PICTURE. UNTIL YOU DO WE ONLY HAVE YOUR WORD THAT IT EXISTS

1. Only the accused has used the Term Non League Rochdale on both forums. EVIDENCE?

2. Only an ex shareholder would know we are Rochdale “Association” Football Club ALL CLUBS ARE ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL CLUBS, THEY BELONG TO THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION AND ITS CALLED ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL. OVERRULED.

3. Most people would think of us as Rochdale FC OVERRULED. I KNOW YOU AS CROTCHFAIL AND OTHER NAMES ARE AVAILABLE

4. Why would there be so much protest, instead of not me. EVERYONE IS ALLOWED TO PROTEST THEIR INNOCENCE, THAT IS NOT AN ARGUMENT, OVERRULED.

The prosecution rests whilst the CUFC Court Judges considers the facts and evidence and confirms Justice has prevailed..


YOU’LL HAVE TO DO BETTER THAN THIS MR DOG
.