this makes total sense to me until the bolded they that assumes there was definitely, unequivocally, a conscious conspiracy planned between [...] to profit from covid. I mean, it's not like some people need incentive to capitalize on all things, even awful things like PPE in a pandemic, is it Magpies59?
By focusing on the govts, pfizer WHO, Bill Gates et al, you seem to be saying 1. they prepared to profit from a pandemic and did so, and 2. that the spontaneous urge to profit from covid is not as bad as a planned response to a pandemic. Am I reading you right?
Last edited by Mud Pie; 29-06-2023 at 01:42 AM.
They don't just have their "hearts to the right", they're some of the most hard-right wing figures within mainstream politics. You can have your own political views and still be thoughtful and fair-minded, but there's nothing in that cast of characters' background that would give that impression. There are not trained journalists.
I'm sceptical both about (a) whether left wing guests do actually appear, who they are, and whether they're any good; and (b) whether they're treated fairly/given equal airtime. It's absolute madness having sitting Tory MPs (including recent ministers) presenting news and current affairs programmes. How can that be right or fair? It's such a conflict of interest.
Imagine a left wing version of GB "News". Instead of Farage, we have Corbyn. Instead of Wooton, we sub in Owen Jones, instead of Rees Mogg we have John O'Donnell. I don't really know enough about Dewberry... perhaps Gina Miller? Parallels don't need to be exact.
Would you watch that? Would you trust that? I'm left wing, and I wouldn't watch that... not as a news channel anyway. Without neutral presenters and interviewers (or as near as we can get), there's no balance and no challenge. It's the definition of an echo chamber.
Yeah, it's partly the level of psychopathy it would need, partly the level of organisational discipline and competence, but mainly it's that even if you are that kind of weapons-grade psychopathic organisational genius, it's not in your interests to even try it because the risks just aren't worth the rewards.
Any crisis presents an opportunity to make money and leverage power, all of the big players would have foreseen this and were ready to jump on an opportunity that presented itself. It would have reached the point where they 'sort of' wanted it, and once you're there, decisions start being made that compromise security.
I think it's similar to 9/11, I don't believe for a moment that those attacks were planned and set up by the west, but they knew something was coming and maybe those in a position to make the final decisions to intervene dithered knowing in the back of their minds that some sort of attack on America would be a very convenient pretext for what ultimately followed.