Quote Originally Posted by hopelesslyoptimistic View Post
Why would you suspect that other than if you disregard EFL rules, legal considerations and business reality.

The legal entity that is the club employs the manager not the shareholder:

Oh, perhaps because by suspecting that it allows you to continue the endless negative narrative.

Good appointment and should play attractive to ball noting his back room staff have also been appointed.
Ok, I'll bite, only because, yet again, you respond to a post of mine only to insult, but that's kind of par for the course.

I suspect (in fact I know it isn't a contract with the current owner), because Radrizanni really can't be bothered with LUFC any more. As such, he is highly unlikely to offer a contract via his LUFC-owning companies to any new manager/coach (nor anyone else in any capacity at LUFC).

In normal circumstances i.e anything that doesn't apply to LUFC, you are correct, the club employs the manager/coach, but as Radrizzani isn't going to offer a contract to anyone, and no-one would sign it anyway, the only way for Farke to begin work is for 49E to contract with him (just as they have with Webber) and for that contract to be subject to TUPE processes when the take-over is approved.

My "endless negative narrative" has been proved correct over the last two seasons, we are where I predicted, and we end up with an ownership sh1theap situation that passes any comparison with previous LUFC cluster-f00ks.

As for Farke, we will see, he won't do f00k all unless 49E have very deep pockets because once the take-over is approved there will be an exodus of players (good and bad) and let's not forget we're a week away from playing Scum in Oslo and about 5 weeks from new seasons start.