O/T:- Banks

[Magpies1959]

You seem to be a tad obsessed with billionaire TV, I am assuming this is directed mainly at GB News, if it is run by a billionaire/s, they could do with digging a bit deeper in their pockets to help with the production, which is way behind the levels put into the BBC and the likes.

[Newish Pie]

You seem to be a tad obsessed with billionaire TV, I am assuming this is directed mainly at GB News, if it is run by a billionaire/s, they could do with digging a bit deeper in their pockets to help with the production, which is way behind the levels put into the BBC and the likes.

Yeah, guilty as charged, I suppose. I think politicised news channels (of whatever stripe or shade) are fundamentally a very bad thing for democracy in this country, and I'm surprised that more people can't see that. Or at the very least see that active politicians should not be presenting current affairs shows. Maybe I'd include Talk TV in this category too, but I don't know much about them.

If you don't already know who funds GB "News", I'd suggest looking into their backers. It's not only the "News" element of the title that should be in inverted commas, it's the "GB" bit too. They're like the "Taxpayers Alliance" and "Islamic State" in that sense - nothing about their name is accurate.