+ Visit West Bromwich Albion FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 51

Thread: Palmer is staying

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #26
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    1,113
    Quote Originally Posted by mickd1961 View Post
    So did Ozil take that route?

    No.

    Has any player?

    No….not that I’m aware of.

    Keegan’s case is entirely different, he was in a management role.

    Might a player take this route?

    For sure they could.

    Will they?

    By the looks of history, no they won’t.

    Will little green aliens invade earth in the next million years?

    Possibly……but probably the same % chance as a player going for constructive dismissal.


    Is there actually a single case of a player having taken this route?
    Quote Originally Posted by mickd1961 View Post
    So did Ozil take that route?

    No.

    Has any player?

    No….not that I’m aware of.

    Keegan’s case is entirely different, he was in a management role.

    Might a player take this route?

    For sure they could.

    Will they?

    By the looks of history, no they won’t.

    Will little green aliens invade earth in the next million years?

    Possibly……but probably the same % chance as a player going for constructive dismissal.


    Is there actually a single case of a player having taken this route?
    Where have I said anything other than ‘MAY’. The point is COUlD. You tell people they nit pick. It’s a bit like pot and kettle. You clearly have not read my post, you clearly have not read the passage I provided for you to read or you would see the point. Ikll try to be clearer. The definition of the word May. ‘MAY’ the word “may” is an expression of possibility, a permissive choice to act or not, and ordinarily implies some degree of discretion. This contrasts with the word “shall,” which is generally used to indicate a mandatory provision.

    Your argument is that it would not be constructive dismissal. I say it can be. That is the point. It’s not the point that it has never been done. There may not have been a case to date, you say the legislation does not cover footballers. I say it is. I can’t make it any clearer for you.

    The point is it could. You refer to history. History explains the past, it does not foresee the future.

    Don’t be to closed minded to everything and be so defensive to anything that differs to your own personal beliefs, particularly when your experience in a given area be limited.

    RTFL, as we say when people continue to misunderstand the obvious.
    Last edited by On Balance; 01-08-2023 at 02:21 PM.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •