Dee4Life Update - The Correct Facts

[Returnofrros]

Seems to me you started it all with a post on Pravda. Disappointed because the first time Dee4life stand up and actually criticise in public the DFC board, something that you and others have been asking for for months, the topic goes off track.

You are still a member bcram.

You unhappy with possible legal action and MSP involvement?

Can you now see Linda will never give D4l what they want, they may have to now fight for it.

What's your thoughts?

[BCram]

You are still a member bcram.

You unhappy with possible legal action and MSP involvement?

Can you now see Linda will never give D4l what they want, they may have to now fight for it.

What's your thoughts?

Think Dee4life have played with a straight bat to use a cricket analogy. Yes I am still a member and I think the Dee4life board have tried their jaw jaw policy and demonstrated that it has run its race. Very disappointed that the topics have been a bit hostile to Dee4life as it seems to me they have tried their best.
Think they need a new approach and I am not sure that legal threats and getting MSPs involved is a sensible way to proceed. Maybe there is merit in trying to help DFC get their planning permission, which will need support from both local councillors and if it gets referred to Holyrood, MSPs. Who knows, perhaps there might be merit in explaining why they think their statement will help DFC.
Maybe their statement has made DFC reassess their approach.
More concerned about Dens not being sold to DFC, and somehow there is an exit strategy that we do not understand.