
Originally Posted by
DerekMiller
Absolute horsesh!te
I never claimed to know what results he'd have got if he had the games Warne got. I just pointed out the facts, those being the points he achieved in the games he was manager. I did try to be fair and point out that his ratio of a point per game would have kept us up in an anomaly year where Reading got a points deduction. But if you see that as an achievement then fair play to you, we all have different standards
I also pointed out another fact; that the season Taylor kept us up was a joint effort because in that season we had 3 managers (albeit Peltier was cover for only one game).
It is a FACT (whether you or Pocket like it or not) that in the season Taylor kept us up, more than a quarter of the overall points were gained by Paul Warne in less than a fifth of the games. You can try and argue that if you want, but you can't change it.
Your "observation" about me sounding like Derbymiller means what exactly? Your broken soundbite rants with nothing to back them up sound like Nigel Farage after an evening on the cheap blend whisky, does that mean you must be him? Of course not. But it's "just an observation."