Quote Originally Posted by islaydarkblue View Post
If you had attended the Dee4life AGM Q and A section You would have heard that Dee4life are not welcome in Gardyne.
From memory it was also stated that communication from the Dee4life board of directors to John Nelms would have to made via the Dundee Football Club SLO.
I accept that John Nelms did not state that he hates Dee4life because he (John Nelms) did not send an official letter to the Dee4life board of directors stating his concerns about the threat of legal action by the Dee4life board of directors and their meetings with the local MSPs to try to get the failure of their primary representative on the Dundee Football Club Limited board of directors and that he hates Dee4life.
It was the opinion of ME that John Nelms was livid about the threat of legal action and he hates Dee4life.
What are the Dee4life board of directors supposed to do if John Nelms will not have meaningful meetings with them.
The simple solution would be for John Nelms to invite the Dee4life board of directors to a ‘clear the air’ meeting in the Club’s offices at Gardyne where all their differences could be discussed and resolved.
The minutes also stated that the DSA ask questions about ticketing and maintenance while Dee4life ask questions about finance and the stadium.
But I didn't attend the AGM and only have the minutes, the formal and historic record of the meeting, as a reference point. If the minutes recorded that John Nelms has stated categorically and on the record that he hates Dee4Life I'd have agreed with you from the start - but they don't say that.

I'm glad you've finally admitted to having lied about John Nelms stating that he hated Dee4Life but that it was in fact only the opinion of one individual that he hated Dee4Life, it wasn't painful was it? And I got your admission into one sentence rather than the rambling paragraph you strung it out to - so much simpler.

If I was John Nelms I'd also be reluctant to deal with an organisation that has, either clearly or by implication, made threats of legal action against me. Maybe the Dee4Life board should swallow their pride and go through the channels suggested to lead the drive toward an amicable solution to the stand off and to a future collaborative relationship? Just a suggestion.

Why would anyone wait for someone they've threatened with legal action to make the first move to reconcile? Maybe a written, public apology would be a start?