Quote Originally Posted by hissingdwarf View Post
Today was shocking. To make matters worse, you add in the Shrewsbury game where we “laughed off the cups” so we could “rest up and concentrate on the league.”
So much for the rest then as we looked slow and second to nearly every ball against a bang average Walsall team.
The LW debate should be taking place imo because of the fact he’s not willing to change his formation or style to the players he’s got available.
Last season, in the conference, it worked. This season, it’s been hit and miss and we’ve been hit with major injuries. That is the point when Lw should be able to see that and change something significant rather than throwing on pointless substitutions that hinder rather than help the game.

Radar obviously got it wrong with Stone so get Brooks back between the sticks and give him a solid run for the next month, regardless of issues.
Tell the players defend first and if that means crack it up field or into the stands, then so be it.
Bring some discipline into defence and force them to do what they were taught at other clubs. Put on hold the pass around at back crap and focus on solidity.

The argument has always been if we don’t have 3 at the back “playing out” then we’d lose the attacking prowess. Well, with 3 at the back today…looked today like we couldn’t attack a piece of paper with a pencil crayon.
The problem is that there is no plan B and most teams will suss out that if they press our backline and midfield, it cuts out any supply to the forwards. Our alternative, kick it long and lose possession.