You aren't upsetting me at all, Frog. My motivation for getting involved in this thread was concern at the manner in which you and others get drawn into conspiracy theories (and yes, that does sound patronising, I know).

I wasn't suggesting that you were exploiting illness, but the people who Tweeted the images were and you were happy to share the Tweet when, on your own admission, you can't say that what it showed was vaccine related. That's how conspiracy theories spread and grow.

I don't think you found evidence of bias. You found evidence of a properly declared source of funding. Can you say that for the material that you have been reading and propagating.

And the point of properly published science is that it is peer reviewed - checked for accuracy and validity before publication by independent scientists. Can you say the same for the Tweets that you have linked to?