+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 1169

Thread: O/T Covid Vaccine mRNA

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,636
    Here's an article about heart health and sport,Frog

    https://www.health.harvard.edu/heart...ect-your-heart

    It's from 2018, Frog. That's two years before the mRNA vaccine roll out.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    42,107
    Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
    Here's an article about heart health and sport,Frog

    https://www.health.harvard.edu/heart...ect-your-heart

    It's from 2018, Frog. That's two years before the mRNA vaccine roll out.
    I remember Ronnie Moore having one on during a televised match. His heart rate was all over the shop.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    42,107
    This seems unbeleivable but the depopularisation by vaccins and steriliasation to reduce the number of people in the world is a documented and recorded goal for The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation



    https://prepareforchange.net/2024/01...kill-billions/
    Last edited by frogmiller; 09-01-2024 at 03:56 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    22,872

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    42,107
    Who fact checks the fact checkers?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    9,341
    Quote Originally Posted by frogmiller View Post
    Who fact checks the fact checkers?
    We do!! By cross checking in much the same way we should be doing for most research sources.

    A summary from their wiki page which I think is about right based on my reading of their summaries:

    Writers at the Poynter Institute, which develops PolitiFact,[24] have stated that "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[4] In 2018, a writer in the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as "an armchair media analysis"[25] and characterized their assessments as "subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in".[26] A study published in Scientific Reports wrote: "While [Media Bias/Fact Check's] credibility is sometimes questioned, it has been regarded as accurate enough to be used as ground-truth for e.g. media bias classifiers, fake news studies, and automatic fact-checking systems.

    I think I trust them enough to get a very good idea on what a media outlets general political intentions and biases are. They seem to have picked up quite well on the guardian's recent decline in fact checking. Impossible to eliminate unconscious bias for sure but you can cross reference this and everything else through an attempt to be objective. Not that I haven't been caught out with crap sources before and no doubt will again. What seems to be a defining thing of our age, with politically active elders being generally the worst for it, is a willingness to accept and share news and articles that confirm our world views without enough critical scrutiny. Its a ****ing malaise!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •