Moving on to the meat and drink of things. You say that ‘we’ll see’ in relation to your claim that mRNA vaccines are causing miscarriages. The vaccine rollout started over 3 years ago. Shouldn’t we be seeing it by now if it is happening?
Setting my position out explicitly:
1. I assume that we can agree that the data that I put up confirms no sudden fall in the birth rate of the UK, US and NZ following the vaccine roll out (such reductions that are present being consistent with long term trends).
2. We are in agreement that if men who have been vaccinated have had their sperm replace by spike protein then they will not be impregnating anyone and so will not be contributing to the birth figures.
3. I hope that we can agree that it is beyond any doubt that if a woman suffers the tragedy of a miscarriage, they will not be in a position to contribute to the birth figures for several months.
4. If vaccinated men aren’t in a position to impregnate and vaccinated women miscarry then there would inevitably be a fall in the birth rate would there not?
So where is the fall in the birth rate, Frog? Why isn’t it there? Where is the miscarriage date upon which your posts were based?



Reply With Quote
