|
| + Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Bringing in a striker of any quality, that is competing for one place against Langstaff is a very tough gig.
I would think it more probable we would strengthen the attacking mids with a view of McGoldrick moving up top if Langstaff was injured.
Nothing against Scott, but should we be relying on a player who by the time he comes back would have played very little football in 12 months?
My desire for a striker is not to replace or be an understudy to Macca but rather someone who can partner him. Didzy was far from his best at the weekend - the same for a few others - but no quality replacements on the bench to change it up.
Wimbledon’s Al-Hamadi gone to Ipswich for a reported £1.75m. Scored fewer goals than Macca and on a shorter contract, but 5 years younger.
Could be an interesting comparison.
If that is the case then the owners' strategy isn't working. Do we need to carry such huge expenses at this level? How do other clubs manage, those with much smaller crowds, some of them are above us?
I guess the only way to be viable is for Football Radar to use the club to showcase its operation. Buying Langstaff for 50K and potentially increasing his value to 1.5 million is exactly the kind of thing that shows it can work. Unfortunately, buying like likes of Morias and Randall proves the opposite. The same with managers, unearthing LW and making a profit on him.
Dipping back into the NL, which we should have left behind forever after 4 painful years, does not show great judgement, particularly dishing out 3.5 year contracts which other managers have not had. We need to start thinking like league club.
Apologies for going against the board's orthodox body of opinion, I know it makes some people angry.
I’m surprised Notts didn’t try to bring Dallas in for the season, he’s ended up at Oldham on loan.