Quote Originally Posted by frogmiller View Post
800,000 readings of the paper and most misinterpreted it so they had to backtrack.

Never in a million years!
Did 800 000 read it? How many were qualified to understand it, or did they simply rely on an interpretation by the likes of 'Illuminatibot'?

There was no real backtracking. Simply an explanation of what the study showed as opposed to the interpretation applied to it by the antivax movement. I imagine they were horrified to see their research abused in that way.