O/T Covid Vaccine mRNA

[frogmiller]

Ma Green on this senate meeting tells of stories of peer review studies being ignored.

https://x.com/fivetimesaugust/status...lcvxGrPcIOixGQ

[frogmiller]

I’ll do some checking on the uk government sight to check this.

https://x.com/bambkb/status/17599346...lcvxGrPcIOixGQ

[frogmiller]

I’ll do some checking on the uk government sight to check this.

https://x.com/bambkb/status/17599346...lcvxGrPcIOixGQ

There are tender notices

https://bidstats.uk/tenders/2022/W28/778764704

[frogmiller]

I’ll do some checking on the uk government sight to check this.

https://x.com/bambkb/status/17599346...lcvxGrPcIOixGQ

The Brisbane Times are running a story on it

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/nat...17-p5baiw.html

[KerrAvon]

Ma Green on this senate meeting tells of stories of peer review studies being ignored.

https://x.com/fivetimesaugust/status...lcvxGrPcIOixGQ

Where does she say that peer reviewed studies have been ignored? I’ve listened to the clip three times (my ears are bleeding) and there is no mention of it. Can you point me to the correct time.

As I mentioned in post 449, a favourite tactic of antivaxxers is to place data out of context. That is what Marjorie Taylor-Greene does here. She has taken VAERS data and is presenting it as demonstrating adverse reactions to vaccination when it shows no such thing.

VAERS (like the UK yellow card system) allows for possible adverse reactions to be reported but that by itself it does not prove a causative link. Instead, the reporting is monitored to detect ‘signals’ in which a particular event is reported at a frequency that is greater than one would expect to see in the population at large. Such signals can be investigated as was quickly done for myocarditis after Pfizer and blood clotting after AZ, both of which resulted in a change of the manner in which they were deployed in the UK.

With the huge numbers of vaccinations given in the US it was and is inevitable that possible adverse events would be recorded.

Ms Taylor - Greene omits to mention that. For example, she makes mention of miscarriages being recorded on VAERS without any attempt to place that in the context of it being an unfortunate occurrence that women can miscarry irrespective of their vaccination status. Do you think that is sensible or honest, Frog?

The psychology of conspiracy theorism is quite interesting and as I have detected no signs that you have tried the two books that I recommended on conspiracy theories, I will share an idea with you.

Human beings have evolved to look for patterns. For our hominid ancestors living on the plains of Africa, it would make sense to look for and react to patterns of light in undergrowth that had the appearance of eyes, because it might indicate the presence of a hungry ambush predator (but might also be simply the way the light was falling on the leaves). That tendency to look for patterns persists, which is why conspiracy theorists often claim to have ‘joined the dots’.

The trick is to consider the possibility that the dots are a random pattern.

P.s. I hope that my mention of evolution hasn’t triggered you. I’m aware that many antivaxxers also dispute that theory. Marjorie Taylor-Greene doesn't:

https://www.axios.com/2021/06/11/mar...utes-evolution

[KerrAvon]

I’ll do some checking on the uk government sight to check this.

https://x.com/bambkb/status/17599346...lcvxGrPcIOixGQ

I’m guessing that your reference to government data is finally an acknowledgment that it does bear out the wild and worrying miscarriage claims that you are happy to repeat. Are you also going to examine the data relied upon by the author of the Tweet and upon which the hospital he works for based their rebuttal?

How about looking around the society in which you live. Surely you would have heard about such a wave of miscarriages? Surely more doctors would have spoken out? Surely there would be fewer ‘new Miller’ threads on here.

In the UK there are currently significant shortages of midwives and nursey places. How is that happening if large numbers of children aren’t being born?

Lots of questions, Frog. I will not hold my breath waiting for an answer to them or the many others that you have ignored.

[KerrAvon]

There are tender notices

https://bidstats.uk/tenders/2022/W28/778764704

And the point of this post is...?

Everyone who has been vaccinated will die, Frog. So will very unvaccinated person. That shouldn't be news to anyone.

[KerrAvon]

The Brisbane Times are running a story on it

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/nat...17-p5baiw.html

So did ABC:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-08-...ages/101322266

Do you know how Mclindon got on the Australian Supreme Court, Frog? This all dates back to August 2022, but I can't find any further reporting on it.

[crashbang]

12000 died of COVID.
15 died of direct result of the vaccine.

[frogmiller]

I’m guessing that your reference to government data is finally an acknowledgment that it does bear out the wild and worrying miscarriage claims that you are happy to repeat. Are you also going to examine the data relied upon by the author of the Tweet and upon which the hospital he works for based their rebuttal?

How about looking around the society in which you live. Surely you would have heard about such a wave of miscarriages? Surely more doctors would have spoken out? Surely there would be fewer ‘new Miller’ threads on here.

In the UK there are currently significant shortages of midwives and nursey places. How is that happening if large numbers of children aren’t being born?

Lots of questions, Frog. I will not hold my breath waiting for an answer to them or the many others that you have ignored.

Yes! And you've swerved none