WBA53 match thread

[boingy]

Please get diangana off. Trouble every time. Costing us every touch or rather lack of touch.

[baggieal]

Everyone around me at the match disgusted reach has come on for fellows. Grady should have gone off!

FFS CC

[boingy]

Wallace a diangana to come off Reach and Weismann on. Yay!

[boingy]

Pieters is a class defender

[kettering_baggie]

Unfathomable, taking Fellows off; Diangana is awful, off at last but Fellows is far more threatening than Reach. Very strange.

[Omegstrat6]

Reach on for Fellows? Really do not get that! Corberan clearly sees something most of us do not with Reach who may be steady but why take Fellows off when we need to create chances to win here? Honestly thought we'd maybe see Bartley and Weimann on if anyone and Diangana and Pieters off.

[Bombers right foot]

Reach on,very strange decision, no doubt we’ll see Corberran’s other love child Chalobah shortly

[Omegstrat6]

Pieters is a class defender

He certainly uses his experience to read the game well but has also been guilty of a few errors today, and that pass back to Palmer could have cost us. Thought maybe Bartley may have come on as he is not only generally solid at the back but his height might help for set pieces too.

[Omegstrat6]

Well, that was a bit of a let off! Could easily have been 2-1 down but need to get back into it as still winnable

[Omegstrat6]

Reach on,very strange decision, no doubt we’ll see Corberran’s other love child Chalobah shortly

What a surprise eh? Tbh, I think Chalobah has improved but surely the only reason to bring him on for Johnston is because Corberan has now judged it better to defend a draw and settle for that than risk trying to win the game?