Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
I have no idea what he is talking about. I don't think he does. My suspicion is that he is simply parroting Bridgen. The clue for that is where he talks about ‘young and previously healthy people are dying at home from cardiac-related events, and we do not know why’ without establishing whether that is actually the case over and above the way it has always happened.
.
I have no idea what data has been realised to Pfizer. Do you?

Davies was talking about the MHRA as opposed to ONS. I don’t know if he’s been made aware of the ONS data that shows lower all-cause mortality in the vaccinated – it doesn’t get trumpeted very much on Twitter. Too inconvenient, I imagine.

With the greatest of respect, are you qualified to criticise or abuse the ONS for the manner in which they refined the excess death data? Do you think adjusting it to account for an ageing population is the wrong approach? On what basis?

Would it satisfy you if the MHRA did a massive date dump on the internet - a spreadsheet with hundreds of thousand of pages, or would you wait for analysis by the likes of Bridgen, Dr Campbell or 'Died Suddenly' to 'inform' you about what it shows?

The MHRA is a public body. It is subject to the Freedom of Information Act, so make a request if you want the documents. You will have to be a bit more specific than the ‘certain data sets’ that Davies referred to.

MPs are as capable of talking crap as you or I. Indeed, some might think that many of them have made a career out of it

My suspicion is that the numbers are being manipulated.
I don’t know the details.
His tone seemed different to Bridgen.
The MHRA is a public body but it’s been said that it’s funded more by phama that the government so is more of a facilitator now. This has lead to the head of it stepping down.
I’d like a neutral body set up to look at the figures on the publics behalf. This will lead to the politicians not being able to talk crap as you say it.

I don’t see your problem with that. If it proves that I have been wrong then I have my answer.

Would that not be what you want?