O/T:- Navalny

[andy6025]

Do you want to have a third try and actually answer the question this time?

Since you couldn’t understand my previous answer, I will indeed try again. My answer is this:

I’m ok either way you like, so long as you are consistent. And I don’t cry crocodile tears over people that are on the payroll.

Is that a clear enough answer for you?

[Jampie]

Since you couldn’t understand my previous answer, I will indeed try again. My answer is this:

I’m ok either way you like, so long as you are consistent. And I don’t cry crocodile tears over people that are on the payroll.

Is that a clear enough answer for you?

This isn't an answer to the question. Try again.

The question, which you've quoted twice now is:

"What are you suggesting? That because someone else might have been murdered, it's ok for Putin to have murdered his political opposition?"

Are you suggesting that or not? Very simple question. A yes or a no would have sufficed.

[andy6025]

This isn't an answer to the question. Try again.

The question, which you've quoted twice now is:

"What are you suggesting? That because someone else might have been murdered, it's ok for Putin to have murdered his political opposition?"

Are you suggesting that or not? Very simple question. A yes or a no would have sufficed.

Did he murder his political opposition? The chief of Ukrainian intelligence says he didn’t.

Are you calling him a liar?