O/T Farmers

[frogmiller]

There has been plenty of 'MSM' coverage if people care to look instead of complaining that there isn't any:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-68249099

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...riculture-fair

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...zero-protests/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-68216353

https://www.theguardian.com/environm...rs-riot-police

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-68414032

There's nothing daft about plants needs CO2 to grow, but I don't think anyone is suggesting eliminating it from the atmosphere. That would be as disastrous to the climate as allowing the amount of it in the atmosphere to rapidly increase.

The thing is Kerr is that it’s not on the evening news, on the radio or on the front pages of the papers then it’s not well known.

All of those links and the stories behind them have been highlighted on this thread over its existence by myself or others.
Other posters were not aware of what was going on.

As CAM kindly indicated to me that there was some news that made the news I would like to thank you in the same way and say cheers.

Nett zero isn’t eliminating CO2 from the atmosphere it is to eliminate the man made CO2 from the atmosphere.
As CO2 stands at 0.4% of the atmosphere and it’s said to be disastrous for plant life if it goes to 0.2% then reducing the tiny percentage of the 0.4% existent could be money wasted.

The Guardian said in a piece that the richest 1% of people produced more CO2 than the poorest 66%.

https://www.theguardian.com/environm...66-report-says