What's the point in giving you a reasoned argument when you just ignore the points being made?
You said earlier that you have an issue with LR's CV and title win because of the budget Wigan had. You then went on to say that they had a MUCH higher budget than anyone else, which according to those figures, is factually incorrect.
So do you still have an issue with his CV or can you accept that he actually did a good job at Wigan that particular season?




Reply With Quote