O/T Covid Vaccine mRNA

[frogmiller]

What are your views on AZ removing their vaccines from the market completely?

We are in year 4 of what would be the testing of a new vaccine under normal conditions yet these experimental vaccines were rushed through.

If these vaccines had gone through the same process and vigorous testing then they would not have gotten to market.

What if the cardiac problems are true for those who coincidentally got ill after their vaccines was directly linked to the vaccines would you say that they too should be removed from market?

At wh as t point do they stop authorising these vaccines to children who are at the least risk of being hospitalised. After all the vaccines cannot stop transmission and never have done. Are they even capable of helping anyone after the mutation of the virus they were aimed at have changed so much. Did the vaccine’s ingredients change with the mutation?

When are these questions going to be asked publicly?

[frogmiller]

Why have Moderna paid $400m to the for NIAID patent rights?

Not long after Moderna kicked off its COVID-19 vaccine launch, questions started swirling around the origins of the company's mRNA technology and the intellectual property rights to its vaccines. Now, Moderna and the U.S. government are putting one dispute to bed.

In Moderna's earnings release Thursday, the company said it recently paid the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) a $400 million "catch-up payment" under a new royalty-bearing license agreement between the parties.


The payment is part of a license agreement between Moderna and NIAID inked late last year. With the deal, Moderna is paying the U.S. government to access “certain patent rights concerning stabilizing prefusion coronavirus spike proteins,” Moderna Chief Financial Officer Jamie Mock said on a conference call Thursday.

Going forward, Moderna agreed to pay NIAID “low single-digit royalties” on COVID-19 vaccine sales, Mock added.

This agreement does not put Moderna out of the woods on the patent litigation front. Even after this deal, the vaccine maker is fighting with the U.S. National Institutes of Health over the origins of the core technology in the vaccine, The New York Times points out.

[frogmiller]

Is the pattern owned by the US government as some people would like you to believe?

It was said to be licensed as an experimental vaccine which as been pointed out can only be done by the military arm of the US government.