We are not lawyers we do not have to provide evidence at that level. He is the Chief Operating Officer
"The COO job description has never been a fixed one: it varies by industry, organization, and need. Some COOs may see their role as that of a mentor, whereas others may be partners or heirs apparent to the chief executive. Managing day-to-day operations and executing the strategies of the top management team are only part of the job. In an uncertain postpandemic environment, the COO role is evolving from its roots in the back office into a catalyst for technology-driven growth, strategic expansion, and employee empowerment. As chief executives increasingly become the public face of organizations and deal with external constituencies and stakeholders, it often falls to COOs to provide internal leadership and direction. And as operations face extraordinary disruptions, COOs are now key players in boosting organizational resilience and value creation. As such, they are often leading contenders for the top job: in 2021, nearly 27 percent of CEOs in Fortune 500 and S&P 500 companies were promoted from the COO role, more than from any other internal position."
https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilitie...023-and-beyond
Basically he is accountable for the implementation of what the board set as strategy and policy, so if we have issues with management or playing staff or contracts etc etc he is accountable. Also he should be visible to the public/customers. I suspect he is doing what he is told and is still there because he is a Yes man rather than a high quality COO. So assuming the board have said we need to have a training facility that is capable of allowing our players to train, he has failed. The fact that SE is doing a warts and all report tells us there are problems in the running of the club, the fact that TS has asked for a full detailed report tells you he thinks there are problems in the running of the club, what more evidence do you want?
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Derbymiller
