I couldn't agree more. If they decide to continue, they should make it conditional upon fundamental improvements being made in the way it's implemented. Even without the headline cock-ups, the way they go about it often seems brain dead. Other sports, e.g. rugby, manage to do it so much better, including the ability for everyone in the ground to hear the dialogue between the ref and the video assistant.
I thought the idea was to draw the ref's attention to clear and obvious errors. There was an obvious example in the Man Ure game this evening, where the ref had his back turned to an incident and was trotting away. That would be an opportunity for a VAR interruption. As it is though, when a goal is scored (flag stays down, ref gives it) the commentator ALWAYS says something like "They'll review it all, of course". It's become routine for the entire run up to the goal to be scrutinised whether or not anyone's shouting the odds about it. What fool thought that was a good way to go? It kills the atmosphere and enjoyment of the game stone dead!