O/T Covid Vaccine mRNA

[KerrAvon]

You may have missed it, but we've already discovered that this august medical publication known as The Lancet is majority owned by Blackrock, who own huge amounts of stock in vaccine associated businesses.

Airfinity are backed by the WHO, so no points there I'm afraid.

Science Media Centre are funded by, among others, Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, Bayer plc, Astra Zeneca (ffs), Elsevier (owned by Blackrock), GlaxoSmithKline, and previously by Pfizer.

Vested interests here? Surely not? (And no mention of Twitter...)

Whether there are any points to be had rather depends upon your view of Blackrock and the WHO.

Blackrock are a wealth management company that looks to find value for its customers. They may be shareholder of the parent company of the publishers of the Lancet, but the view that they are capable of, or would be interested, in having an influence over what is published is faintly laughable. Do you have any actual evidence of such an influence?

I see that Legal and General are also a shareholder. Are they also apparently exerting a baleful influence or are they just trying to achieve growth for the pensions funds that they manage?

The WHO is a UN agency. I suspect that it’s a bit bureaucratic and inefficient and that there is probably a bit of corruption here and there (I base that on the experiences of afraid who spent time working for UNHCR), but again, the notion that they are some sort of Machiavellian organisation plotting the downfall of humanity seems a bit silly.

Do you have any evidence to suggest that the AZ vaccine didn’t save millions of lives?

[Eternal Optimist]

...Blackrock are a wealth management company that looks to find value for its customers. They may be shareholder of the parent company of the publishers of the Lancet, but the view that they are capable of, or would be interested, in having an influence over what is published is faintly laughable. Do you have any actual evidence of such an influence?...

Breaking down your words, you say Blackrock's raison d’être is to find value for its shareholders. You then propose they won't expect any kind of return from the Lancet. Logic fail...

...The WHO is a UN agency. I suspect that it’s a bit bureaucratic and inefficient and that there is probably a bit of corruption here and there (I base that on the experiences of afraid who spent time working for UNHCR), but again, the notion that they are some sort of Machiavellian organisation plotting the downfall of humanity seems a bit silly...

The UN, founded in 1945 to "end all wars", yet since then we've relentless wars year on year. In the commercial world that would be known as mission failure. As a direct result of this, the Blackrock/Vanguard/State Streets of this world have racked up enormous profits over this period through arms sales. If you're happy to ignore the relevance of making profit from this death cult, knock yourself out.

...Do you have any evidence to suggest that the AZ vaccine didn’t save millions of lives?...

It's the way you tell 'em...