
Originally Posted by
Young_Nudger
I’d be surprised to hear anything other than this:
Directors decide on Thalhammer.
An immigration laywer is appointed.
The lawyer points out that Thalhammer hasn’t the experience to qualify - but we might able to push it through - and if we fail there’s a chance we could win it on appeal.
The directors follow that advice.
Thalhammer was denied after the appeal.
Thalhammer, the directors and the lawyers have done nothing wrong.
Some supporters are just wanting something to kick.