In addition to the above--
"Not many buy a football club hoping to make money"
The Investor Group of New York Hedge Funds, including JAQ and husband Matthew Edmonds, bought 20% of the shares in BFC in the hope of promised profits from player trading and asset sales. It's what Hedge Funds do, look to make profit from investments.
Can say what you want about attending the ‘Conway Out’ presentation at the Garrison.
But the proof is in the pudding.
And the proof - if proof was needed - that you can see no wrong in Paul Conway.
That when it comes to either supporting Neerav or Conway - then you support Conway.
Absconding Conway.
Blaming Neerav instead.
………. Anyone who doesn't think breaking EFL ownership rules is a good thing
…….. Anyone who doesn't create so many new shares in its business so that it actually dilutes the club's market value down to virtually nil .
………… Any one who hasn't overseen their club losing £5m every season despite the fact it's consistently sold every decent player it's had since it arrived at the club .
BTW - Khaled, which some of the other items you listed relates to - was also a Conway appointment.
Last edited by Young_Nudger; 27-05-2024 at 08:05 AM.
On the pyss tek again Nudger. Tell thi truth, I actually find it quite amusing what tha comes art wi to get the reaction tha looking for. It's good for my mental health reading through threads thaz hijacked. This morning a woke up and contemplated mortality only to read this thread and feel a tad better
Glad tha feels better.
Just answering a few questions posed to me by SB, Animal and Shads in relation to their support for Paul Conway and to a lesser extent their support for Khaled.
I’m trying to explain to them that Conway and Khaleds involvement at the club wasn’t necessarily a good thing and actually it negatively impacted the club.
And the damage these two did is taking the present owners a while to turn things around..
I finally persuaded them that Conway was no longer in charge - although it took me about 9 months to do it.
And I’m sure I’ll eventually get through to them on this one.
Possibly more than your good self Nudge.
The £750K taken from BFC Club Accounts to pay the first instalment was dressed up as a "Directors Bonus".
Any Director in any Limited Company can decline his/ her bonus and request it be returned to the Company budget. Parekh and JAQ allowed their share to be transferred from Club Accounts to help pay that first instalment. Conway could not instruct them to allow their share to be transferred.
Parekh's and JAQ's (via the Investor Group) hands are not clean on this one and they cannot take the moral high ground.
I think you overstate your importance YN somewhat , your a non entity at worst and amusing at best as far as I'm concerned , the classic David Icke affect , at least he makes a living from his nonsense whilst you frequent the internet space of a third division club on a board with less than 10 regular posters , imagine a world where David Icke is smarter than you ?
Debating anything with you is a bit like myself debating economics with my 3 year old granddaughter .
It's best to stick to Peppa Pig and Hey Duggee where at least we can communicate in order to enjoy quality time .
You haven"t apologised to me for your comments about taking money out of the club which I have never made , thats the thing with you Nudger and that is you want debate but when you are in the wrong you never admit it , you were bang out of order and I await my apology
Definitely a conceited person is Nudger. He offers an alternative point of view on everything from the assessment of a Barnsley match to the owners. All to get some attention. I've come across this type of person before. Says the opposite yo cause a stir or get a response. None of his 'opinions' are backed up with anything credible. It's no good coming on here or most other walks of life spouting shyte without any back up or reason to it. Tha'll get laughed art o room cos tha dealing wi intelligent people who may not always agree, however, there's reasoning and thought that's gone into their opinions. Stuff that makes you think and contemplate.
The 'Conway lovers' or 'Conway supporters' is the latest Nudger pyss take. What's been written on here about Conway over the years will tell you people's thoughts on the blowk- most posters have dislike for the blowk (and thats putting it mildly) yet in an effort to get a response, Nudger has the audacity to label these same posters as 'Conway lovers/supporters'.
Think tha needs to go back to playground Nudger