+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 18 of 26 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 ... LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 257

Thread: League Two Signings Thread 2024/25

  1. #171
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    701
    Quote Originally Posted by SmiffyPie View Post
    Can't see how you could think we could be way ahead? 4 or 5 is a bloody big rebuild and we have got one in (a free signing (the Radar way). We need some good defenders and a good goalkeeper but we all know we aren't going to chase ones that cost ££ (not the Radar way) so we will just have to be patient and see what they produce. Hopefully it's not going to be a long long June and into July!
    I'm not sure where you get the 'Free' being the Radar way and ££ not being the Radar way. We paid plenty for Jatta, Macca wasn't free either. I am sure we paid for others. We also saw this with RR who we knew we wouldn't keep, but let him go for free rather than sell as they thought there was more value in getting promotion than we would get from selling.

    The Radar way isn't about how many £s we spend, but making sure that we get the maximum for every £ we spend and not spaffing money up the wall. So, if a goalkeeper costs £££, but Radar thinks they are worth £££££ then I can see us being in for them... persuading them to come to us may be the bigger issue.

  2. #172
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    14,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Kent Magpie View Post
    I'm not sure where you get the 'Free' being the Radar way and ££ not being the Radar way. We paid plenty for Jatta, Macca wasn't free either. I am sure we paid for others. We also saw this with RR who we knew we wouldn't keep, but let him go for free rather than sell as they thought there was more value in getting promotion than we would get from selling.

    The Radar way isn't about how many £s we spend, but making sure that we get the maximum for every £ we spend and not spaffing money up the wall. So, if a goalkeeper costs £££, but Radar thinks they are worth £££££ then I can see us being in for them... persuading them to come to us may be the bigger issue.
    My Radar way is a label, a generalisation (of course it is) but Jatta (E150k from a club they have a controlling interest in) and Macca (£50k) was exactly the Radar way, get at a good price with a view to resale value.

  3. #173
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,096
    Quote Originally Posted by SmiffyPie View Post
    My Radar way is a label, a generalisation (of course it is) but Jatta (E150k from a club they have a controlling interest in) and Macca (£50k) was exactly the Radar way, get at a good price with a view to resale value.
    We paid a fee for Morais too.

  4. #174
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    701
    Quote Originally Posted by SmiffyPie View Post
    My Radar way is a label, a generalisation (of course it is) but Jatta (E150k from a club they have a controlling interest in) and Macca (£50k) was exactly the Radar way, get at a good price with a view to resale value.
    I would agree mostly, but I am not sure how much they factor in resale value. That surely comes into it, but I think if they see a player that costs a lot (wages / fee) and is aging but can increase our ticket sales and give us a better chance of promotion then they will do it. I think McGoldrick may have been in this category (I am not convinced that they would let sentiment sway them to a huge extent). Likewise, they will forego a transfer fee if they think that letting the contract expire will increase our chances of promotion (RR and Wooton). I just don't think that the model is rigidly buy cheap and young and sell on at a profit.... but I do think that is the preferred route if they can.

  5. #175
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    14,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Kent Magpie View Post
    I would agree mostly, but I am not sure how much they factor in resale value. That surely comes into it, but I think if they see a player that costs a lot (wages / fee) and is aging but can increase our ticket sales and give us a better chance of promotion then they will do it. I think McGoldrick may have been in this category (I am not convinced that they would let sentiment sway them to a huge extent). Likewise, they will forego a transfer fee if they think that letting the contract expire will increase our chances of promotion (RR and Wooton). I just don't think that the model is rigidly buy cheap and young and sell on at a profit.... but I do think that is the preferred route if they can.
    Yes they do make good decisions when it is in our immediate best interest (opportunistic (McGoldrick) and necessary (RR and Wooton)) no arguments there.

  6. #176
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    4,381
    They’ve said it so many times I don’t get why people don’t get? It’s about getting as much value out of their budget as possible and using data as much as possible to achieve that. Of course they will try and get players that they may see future resale value in buts that’s not the only/primary approach.

  7. #177
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    532
    Chey Dunkley is a crazy signing for this level. Chesterfield are really throwing the kitchen sink at back to back promotions. I'm getting a sense of deja vu though, they did this the last time Cook was there. He got them to L1 after spending huge money, and then he left and they dropped like a stone. It will be interesting to see how it ends up.

  8. #178
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Posts
    1,025
    Data and value is all good and well providing you get players in. We saw last season the damage dithering and holding out to our principles did! Poor keeper, couple of poor signings and an ageing creaking defence. Please let's not have a repeat

  9. #179
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    4,419
    Quote Originally Posted by MapperleyMagpie View Post
    Data and value is all good and well providing you get players in. We saw last season the damage dithering and holding out to our principles did! Poor keeper, couple of poor signings and an ageing creaking defence. Please let's not have a repeat
    Any repeat and we're relegated

  10. #180
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Posts
    1,025
    Quote Originally Posted by Chicken Balti Pie View Post
    Any repeat and we're relegated
    Fully agree balti

Page 18 of 26 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •