Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
Are you assuming that you were harmed by the vaccine or do you have an authorative diagnosis?

Either way, you are missing the point; every peer reviewed study that I am aware of confirms that the benefits of the vaccines outweighs the very rare occasion where they caused harm. On that basis then of course they must continue to be available to the public.

It goes back to my seat belt analogy. Seat belts can cause serious injury and death, but the extent to which they prevent serious harm and death far outweighs that risk.

I am aware that might seem harsh, but none of the above has a bearing upon the tragedy that can flow from side effects or would justify lightly imposed mandates.
Every Vaccine has casualties! I know that and I'm not saying otherwise. What I am saying that the mNRA vaccine is an experimental drug that was given emergency license.

My health issues start just after my second vaccine jab, and yes I am recognised within the French system and I do get a monthly pension until the day I retire.

There you go on about seat belts as if it is siomething remotely simular. If a car manufacturer fitted a new type of seat belt that was found to be faulty they would be forced to stop fitting them and any vehicle with the faulty ones would be recalled. It is the same reason that the ISO system works well. Any batch of faulty goods can be traced and recalled!