Quote Originally Posted by gazan View Post
I am also, generally, happy with the way the club is run. However, the point of my raising the question is to do with the future. I enjoy the fact that board members limited to a 12.5% stake in the club but I worry that in the long-term we may need to seek further help. The potential problems with having a 'sugar daddy' are well-documented. It's a conundrum but one the club is going to have to contemplate in the near future without relying on current board members constantly dipping into their own pockets.
I think a sugar daddy is not what the club needs but what it does need is that the members with a 12.5% stake in the club have significant personal wealth that they are prepared to put into the club. Or we need to find a unique way to raise first team funds which at the moment are absolutely abysmal.