O/T Covid Vaccine mRNA

[crashbang]

No s41t Sherlock

[frogmiller]

A paper that first puplished by the Lancet then taken down has been now peer reviewed. 74% of people dropping dead in the study was caused by or contributed to by the vaccines!

https://x.com/MattHoyOfficial/status...39872736706675

[frogmiller]

https://x.com/MattHoyOfficial/status...39872736706675

[frogmiller]

LANCET CENSORED Paper is now peer reviewed and available online!

"A Systematic REVIEW of Autopsy findings in deaths after COVID-19 vaccination"

"325 autopsy cases"

"We found that 73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination."

"Our data suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death."

This is a victory of SCIENCE over CENSORSHIP!!

Incredible perseverence by first author Nicolas Hulscher who didn't give up after LANCET pulled the paper within 24 hours after 100,000s of downloads for no legitimate reason.

Big pharma put the squeeze on the Lancet but has failed to stop �� the truth from coming out!

The paper was delayed by one ☝�� year, and those actions of CENSORSHIP and CANCELLATION led to many deaths that could have been prevented.



https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...79073824001968

[KerrAvon]

LANCET CENSORED Paper is now peer reviewed and available online!

"A Systematic REVIEW of Autopsy findings in deaths after COVID-19 vaccination"

"325 autopsy cases"

"We found that 73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination."

"Our data suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death."

This is a victory of SCIENCE over CENSORSHIP!!

Incredible perseverence by first author Nicolas Hulscher who didn't give up after LANCET pulled the paper within 24 hours after 100,000s of downloads for no legitimate reason.

Big pharma put the squeeze on the Lancet but has failed to stop �� the truth from coming out!

The paper was delayed by one ☝�� year, and those actions of CENSORSHIP and CANCELLATION led to many deaths that could have been prevented.



https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...79073824001968

I’ll deal with this in two parts, firstly by expanding on the 'history' in the email.

The ‘study’ was originally uploaded to ‘Preprints with The Lancet’ which, in the words of The Lancet, means that it was not a Lancet publication or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. Instead, it was an early-stage research paper that had not been peer-reviewed and had simply been checked for relevance.

Pre-prints with The Lancet then took it down, explaining that:

‘the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology’.

I think it is entirely possible that it was downloaded hundreds of thousands of times if the Twitter antivaxx community spotted it, although I very much doubt that it was spread around the internet with the warning that attaches to Preprints with The Lancet which reads:

These preprints are early-stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed.

In the absence of evidence, the notion that ‘Big pharma put the squeeze on the Lancet’ is presumably a product of the Tweeter’s imagination/paranoid tendencies.

The authors of the paper have now chosen to put it up on what is known to research scientists as a ‘pay to play’ site. In other words, they’ve paid to have it published in an obscure journal. I think it fair to assume that they either haven’t tried to get it into a leading journal like the BMJ, NEJM or Nature or tried and were told to b*gger off after the journal read it.