+ Visit Dundee FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 178

Thread: Another truth bomb

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    5,534
    Quote Originally Posted by Deebunked View Post
    You're not making any sense. On one hand you seemed to be saying it was wrong that "other people" indirectly paid for education to be free. Now you're saying you disagree only that can afford it directly can have it. Which is it?

    I know from experience that the education itself being free isn't handing anyone anything. It's simply making the opportunity a bit more possible. The poor still have to make sacrifices to get through it, or put in a much bigger amount of effort. Fees on top would make it largely impossible.

    You see that in England where the ratio for the poorest kids going to Uni is approx half of the less poor and that widens to about a third for the top universities. The odds are stacked against poorer kids.
    Hi Deebunked. Spent a long time trying to answer your questions. Trying to be precise. I thought my answers showed that we need a different approach because we do not seem to be making things better.

    I think I should have placed more emphasis on the words " it needs more than just GIVING help, imo. We've been trying to close the attainment gap for decades, Tony Blair, Education Education Education, giving everyone the chance to go to University, Nicola Sturgeon in Scotland when she was responsible for Education and Alex Salmond's pledge the Scottish universities would not charge fees.
    I think the idea that education is an important way to escape poverty is not believed by the very people who we think education would help. I include you , me, Tony Blair, Nicola Sturgeon, Alex Salmond in that "we".
    If what we are doing isn't improving things, why should we think that carrying on with the same approach will improve things?

    I went to university in the days where you received a grant based on your parents income. There were different and distinct options for tertiary education and apprenticeships and technical colleges and further education establishments gave opportunity to those whose school experience had not been successful in terms of their academic achievement.

    I am not waging some class war against the poor. I just said that I agreed with TheAuld Yin's comment.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    311
    Quote Originally Posted by BCram View Post
    Hi Deebunked. Spent a long time trying to answer your questions. Trying to be precise. I thought my answers showed that we need a different approach because we do not seem to be making things better.

    I think I should have placed more emphasis on the words " it needs more than just GIVING help, imo. We've been trying to close the attainment gap ofor decades, Tony Blair, Education Education Education, giving everyone the chance to go to University, Nicola Sturgeon in Scotland when she was responsible for Education and Alex Salmond's pledge the Scottish universities would not charge fees.
    I think the idea that education is an important way to escape poverty is not believed by the very people who we think education would help. I include you , me, Tony Blair, Nicola Sturgeon, Alex Salmond in that "we".
    If what we are doing isn't improving things, why should we think that carrying on with the same approach will improve things?

    I went to university in the days where you received a grant based on your parents income. There were different and distinct options for tertiary education and apprenticeships and technical colleges and further education establishments gave opportunity to those whose school experience had not been successful in terms of their academic achievement.

    I am not waging some class war against the poor. I just said that I agreed with TheAuld Yin's comment.
    All of those tertiary education still options exist today.

    For me the attainment gap is not about the levels or options of education available but the social security system which is rewarding people to do nothing at all and low wages in the workplace which disincentivise some from working at all.

    The country is also being robbed blind by all kinds of chancers both foreign and domestic and doesn't raise income well from the behemoth companies that can afford to play the system with clever financial people in their team.

    We could start by really closing our borders to illegal immigration and making immigration for those who will contribute well easier.

    The problem with that idea is the loony left won't allow the former and the really right won't allow the latter.

    Meanwhile Romanians will continue to send our social security cash back to thier homeland as a free gift.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •