I often wondered who Tommy Ten Names financial backers were. If this article from the Guardian is correct then it's a pretty unsavoury group of right wing tossers, IMO.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...t-brexit-march
|
| + Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
You can repeat that as often as you like, unfortunately repeating something doesn't make it true, so you may think that but your wrong in many ways as I explained quite clearly the last time you made the ludicrous statement.
I would have expected you to understand the difference between "hate" speech and a simple insult, which may I grant you result in conflict but then so can many comments or actions. Or is it your prejudice and bias that somehow makes you think that the gammons are a poor misunderstood and badly treated minority?
Mein Kampf? WTF? Where did you get that comparison from? Next you'll be claiming the Nazi's were socialists because they called themselves National Socialists!
I often wondered who Tommy Ten Names financial backers were. If this article from the Guardian is correct then it's a pretty unsavoury group of right wing tossers, IMO.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...t-brexit-march
It is hate speech and it demonstrates your lack of understanding of you believe it can only be aimed at ‘the poor’, ‘the badly treated’ or’(a) minority’. Regrettably for you, we are in the era of offence being in the eye of a the offended - there’s enough case law around now to enlighten even a bigot like yourself, maybe not though
I thought the MK analogy might help you explain your ramblings, you mention it’s disciples often enough and even practise some of the traits of it’s foul tempered foul mouthed author
Where do you want to start?
1. lying about not punishing pensioners? ( keep your eye on this one they aint done yet. )
2. Lying about smashing the gangs as illegal migration ( sorry I forgot, they've changed it to irregular migration) as the boat crossings grow by the week. Lets dismantle everything that was in place, before doing anything else?
3. Division, as he picks out and targets the white population for daring to criticise the government on its policies of lack of action. Suddenly , everyone condeming mass migration and moaning about it, is far right and a racist. A tiny minority decide to riot(wrongly) so he starts to change the response rules without parliament. Folks having their doors kicked in at 5 am for posting stuff he doesn't like. Yet crime like the Romanian knifing the kid, gets very little attention. Two tier policing is very real and widespread. He sits down with the cops, so don't say he doesn't have remit on this. Folks watch the Palestinian hate marches continue and he allows it to molly coddled.
4. Rayner rips up the natives first policy on new housing. Meaning native born poor working class, really are bottom of the pile now.
Again, more anger will grow and explode.
5. Asked if his loyalties sit with the UK or DAVOS, he instantly jumped for the global gang
6. Giving away billions to other countries for their green madness, whilst confiscating prime agriculture land for solar monstrosities. ,Milliband is like a man pocessed on drugs.
In 4 weeks this lot have had the country turning on its head. Sorry, but you can't have your normal whinge of TORIES/ TORIES/ TORIES,
They are in charge and its all on them , to quote your good self.
You aint seen nowt yet. The hints are there for whats coming. From income tax to national insurance to hammering the motorist. He's sidling up to Europe in many ways, that he never explains.
The way he's going, he'll be having the place running like China soon, the way he's removing rights bit by bit. His arrogance is quite frankly repulsive
He'll be gone in less than a year, the moment his plans encroach on his left masters.
Last edited by Trickytreesreds; 13-08-2024 at 09:25 PM.
Actually we are not, despite you having obviously swallowed some of the more bizarre ramblings of the right, in an age where offence is in the eye of the beholder, some people get offended tough, unless it meets the definitions, which you quoted last time and I comprehensively explained and demonstrated that you were talking tosh.
Seeing as I did not say it can only be aimed at the poor, the badly treated or a minority, you clearly do not understand what hate speech is.
Gammon, is a term which yes can be described as an insult, but is understood to refer to angry, crimson faced middle aged or older, white blokes, generally moaning about how "things ain't what they used to be" or similar perhaps that might be you? In which case I can understand your sensitivity but it still doesn't make it hate speech. But hey if it makes you happy to think that is the case then so be it, I mean who I am to disabuse someone who is clearly rather deluded?
But then that is rather gammon like it seems to me.
There is enough case law to show your right? Really, come on then do put an actual example, as against your usual "you think that should be the case" justification for your unverifiable claims.