Quote Originally Posted by Deebunked View Post
There's nothing democratic about winning 34% of the vote of the people who voted and getting 63% (412) of the seats
while someone else gets 14% of the votes of the people who voted and get 1% (5) of the seats.

Nor a different party who gets 12% ofd the votes of the people who voted but get 11% (72) of the seats.

I struggle to see any level of democratic principle in there even though I don't like the party that's getting shafted.
I think that you have described the strength of a democratic system. You can vote if you want to. If you don't vote you are accepting the decisions of others. This creates the potential for change, and we have more choices than a simple duopoly like the USA.
It's the potential for peaceful political change that's important.