Wiltsmiller, leave it out please. Does it matter how Stansmate posts his wording? So long as we understand what he has to say, for one, I enjoy his contribution to this site.
Have a ponder on this and I guarantee you get every word:
"It deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."
That's 50 times worse than Stansmate' last post but you understood it didn't you?




Reply With Quote