Quote Originally Posted by Bojangles9 View Post
Not news but 11th March they released the findings of the review after the last collapse




https://www.afc.co.uk/2024/03/11/clu...review-update/


Far?s our Technical Director?

Surely they would be the person with the oversight to not allow us to go into yet another season with an imbalanced squad.


Wouldn?t have allowed us to have only one RB. And one in his 30s who we are just flogging week in week out.
Wouldn?t have allowed us to have two 33 year olds as our main midfield with one coming straight in after a full season in Norway.
Wouldn?t have allowed us to not have a proven striker on our books.

Would maybe have actually managed our mythical pathway for youth that might have seen some of our kids get a chance. Seen some bloody energy and devil may care attitude into this team. (Disappointed in JT in this respect).


Just get impression behind the scenes as much a shambles as ever. No joined up thinking.
Said it when new recruitment gadgie came in, all well and good he?s Thelins man but when he inevitably goes this boy probably will too and we?re back to square one and new guy on the back foot.


This is not a cue to kick Gunn, not his fault he was promoted without experience and the personal abuse he gets is vile, but we need an experienced football person in.

This saga is longer than Barons fee.
I don't keep up with what happens behind the scenes, but I am pretty sure Gunn has no involvement in our signings others than preparing and finalising contracts.

It would possibly do the club good to advise who actually does what at the club, as some of the shyte written about folk is way over the top


That said, until the baldy, bankrupt builder is kicked out, there will always be a horrible smell hanging around the club.