+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 242 of 619 FirstFirst ... 142192232240241242243244252292342 ... LastLast
Results 2,411 to 2,420 of 6186

Thread: Election Year or Fear!

  1. #2411
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,687
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    It wasn’t me who used that phrase and the person who did wasn’t specifically referring to you, rather the more professional, political bandwagon riders.
    I apologise , i misunderstood that.

  2. #2412
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,687
    Maggie Oliver here nails it.

    She also points out the fact, that a lot of these monsters, who were supposed to be deported, haven't been. Another failing of the justice system and the ECHR being abused.

    Brown it seems, needs investigating over this.
    Sunak shows himself up, as the uninformed idiot he was, probably didn't care


    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/politics/g...en/ar-AA1wRNtd

    https://www.manchestereveningnews.co...liver-28447178
    Last edited by Trickytreesreds; 09-01-2025 at 09:52 AM.

  3. #2413
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    9,421
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    It wasn?t me who used that phrase and the person who did wasn?t specifically referring to you, rather the more professional, political bandwagon riders.
    Exactly.

  4. #2414
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    9,421
    With regard to deportations, TTR is correct when he says some who should have been deported haven't been. I have no idea how many. I am aware of one case where the perpetrator, realising that he was likely to be deported after completing his sentence, renounced his Pakistani nationality, he became stateless and, as such, there was nowhere the government of the day could send him. He's still in his old 'hood and it's feasible he could cross paths with victims every day of the week.

    Why couldn't he be deported? International Law, so not the UK Justice System or the ECHR at fault but International Law.

    Those currently wanting more deportations should look at WHY they haven't happened and, in many cases, it won't be our justice system or the ECHR behind it.

  5. #2415
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,687
    Quote Originally Posted by MadAmster View Post
    With regard to deportations, TTR is correct when he says some who should have been deported haven't been. I have no idea how many. I am aware of one case where the perpetrator, realising that he was likely to be deported after completing his sentence, renounced his Pakistani nationality, he became stateless and, as such, there was nowhere the government of the day could send him. He's still in his old 'hood and it's feasible he could cross paths with victims every day of the week.

    Why couldn't he be deported? International Law, so not the UK Justice System or the ECHR at fault but International Law.

    Those currently wanting more deportations should look at WHY they haven't happened and, in many cases, it won't be our justice system or the ECHR behind it.
    All I'll say to that is, would other countries around the world have allowed it to fester on?
    I doubt it very much. Marched up a gang plank of a C130 if necessary. Australia, US wouldn't hesitate.
    You put pressure on their countries to take them back, by refusing to issue more VISAS until they do.

    Basicly, spineless governments with things to hide.

    https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/home-offi...klash-scandal/

  6. #2416
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    15,548
    Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
    I apologise , i misunderstood that.
    Fair enough. I disagree with much of what you say and abhor the tactics and contempt for the truth shown by Musk, Trump, Farage et al, but accept your apology and respect your willingness to accept that you were mistaken on this occasion.

  7. #2417
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    9,035
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    ....I disagreed. Oddly others at the meeting who had remained conspicuously silent throughout rushed to say, glad you said that, someone needed to at the end.

    ....the case went nowhere because the police didn?t consider him a sufficiently reliable witness. Enormously frustrating on many levels.

    ....going it alone would, I suspect, have been very ill advised.
    ...all of which IMO relate to a negative human trait of 'following the herd'. That first anecdote rings so true to me (in business settings which I accept are a bit different), I've sat amongst colleagues where the majority will either go with the opinion of a senior/subject 'expert' or won't speak up against same, despite diagreeing with them, either for fear of being accused of an 'ism' of some sort, or having a 'marker' against them for job retention/career progression, or just for being made to look foolish around peers. Then its resident gob****e AF (or notable others) who speak up at risk, with later slaps on the back from the cowards in the room. Having followed the grooming issue a bit and more so over the last few days I find it unbelievable that so many 'professionals' (police, social workers etc) could independantly decide that community harmony mattered more than protecting vulnerable females, there MUST have been a significant amount of 'follow my leader'/herd mentality going on

  8. #2418
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    9,421
    Just seen an interview with the lead detective from the Oxford grooming/rape gang trial where around a dozen got kail sentences. When asked about the inquiry argument that's going on his comment was that priority should be given to implementing the recommendations of the 2022 Jay report rather than throwing money at a new inquiry.

    Fancy me agreeing with a, ex copper

  9. #2419
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,687
    Quote Originally Posted by MadAmster View Post
    Just seen an interview with the lead detective from the Oxford grooming/rape gang trial where around a dozen got kail sentences. When asked about the inquiry argument that's going on his comment was that priority should be given to implementing the recommendations of the 2022 Jay report rather than throwing money at a new inquiry.

    Fancy me agreeing with a, ex copper
    I agree that the recommendations should be implemented.
    But it still doesn't explain/ expose those who were complicit is covering this up and allowing it to happen.

    This guy is despised by the Labour party, and is becoming a ticking time bomb for them

    https://x.com/recusant_raja/status/1877157326173487378


    https://x.com/recusant_raja

  10. #2420
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    9,421
    Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
    I agree that the recommendations should be implemented.
    But it still doesn't explain/ expose those who were complicit is covering this up and allowing it to happen.

    This guy is despised by the Labour party, and is becoming a ticking time bomb for them

    https://x.com/recusant_raja/status/1877157326173487378


    https://x.com/recusant_raja
    You obviously know the content of the Jay report better than I do.

Page 242 of 619 FirstFirst ... 142192232240241242243244252292342 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •