General News Chat

[Mason89]

As far as I?m aware he?s never been convicted of raping anyone whether in civil or criminal case. He was found guilty of ***ual abuse completely different.
Anyway you not busy peddling more clap trap about Peterhead Football Club when it?s actually a church group thats in the video.

Jimmy Saville wasnt convicted of anything. It?s an odd hill to die on.

It?s just very odd that you still think her record should rule her out but his shouldnt. Theres an awful lot to unpack there.

[Basingstokered]

Jimmy Saville wasnt convicted of anything. It?s an odd hill to die on.

It?s just very odd that you still think her record should rule her out but his shouldnt. Theres an awful lot to unpack there.

Jimmy Seville was also dead when the allegations were made so how could he be convicted. Also aren?t you a big fan of innocent until proven guilty like your defense of Nicola Sturgeon.
Perhaps you can tell me what her record as VP is

[Mason89]

Jimmy Seville was also dead when the allegations were made so how could he be convicted. Also aren?t you a big fan of innocent until proven guilty like your defense of Nicola Sturgeon.
Perhaps you can tell me what her record as VP is

Jimmy was very much alive when allegations were made.

Id be interested to know what it is about her record, that makes it worse than Trumps. Genuinely interested how you square that away

[Basingstokered]

Jimmy was very much alive when allegations were made.

Id be interested to know what it is about her record, that makes it worse than Trumps. Genuinely interested how you square that away

Classic Mason unable to answer points of him so just ignores them.
As I?ve said she has no record as VP. The fact the democrats knew Biden was mentally impaired yet still put him before her as the presidential pick shows what they thought of her. They could have removed a Biden in advance of the election to let her be the president however again decided.
So what?s her record as VP that impresses you

[Mason89]

I was impressed that as Vice President, she never s*xually assaulted anyone, never did a Joey Deacon impression to the worlds press, never went golfing, never said there were good people at a Nazi rally, never paid off a p0rn star, never lied about paying off a p0rn star, didnt think Hamas got $100m worth of Johnnys, started an insurrection, pardoned those involved in an insurrection, transphobia, bonkers tariffs, crawling up Putins @rsehole, calling Canada the 51st state, wanting to annex Greenland, putting a guy out his t1ts on Ket in charge of the economy, putting a guy out his t1ts in charge of public health, threatening to destabilise Europe, encouraging Nazi salutes and sh1tting herself. That was impressive

Youve got to weigh that up against her poor knowledge of cloud storage though

[Basingstokered]

I was impressed that as Vice President, she never s*xually assaulted anyone, never did a Joey Deacon impression to the worlds press, never went golfing, never said there were good people at a Nazi rally, never paid off a p0rn star, never lied about paying off a p0rn star, didnt think Hamas got $100m worth of Johnnys, started an insurrection, pardoned those involved in an insurrection, transphobia, bonkers tariffs, crawling up Putins @rsehole, calling Canada the 51st state, wanting to annex Greenland, putting a guy out his t1ts on Ket in charge of the economy, putting a guy out his t1ts in charge of public health, threatening to destabilise Europe, encouraging Nazi salutes and sh1tting herself. That was impressive

Youve got to weigh that up against her poor knowledge of cloud storage though

So nothing that she actually accomplished whilst VP. Again if she was so capable why did they choose to go with Biden

[Mason89]

Im not convinced there was anything she could do that wouldve been enough, if youre still willing to overlook the other stuff. Theres only two possible reasons for that

If she had sat there and did absolutely nothing at all, like Charlie Mulgrew seeing out his contract, that would still be preferable to what the other side was offering

Bannon giving Nazi salutes, Elon waving a chainsaw about and a measles outbreak in Texas. This week.

Still preferable to having a woman in charge though eh?

[Basingstokered]

Im not convinced there was anything she could do that wouldve been enough, if youre still willing to overlook the other stuff. Theres only two possible reasons for that

If she had sat there and did absolutely nothing at all, like Charlie Mulgrew seeing out his contract, that would still be preferable to what the other side was offering

Bannon giving Nazi salutes, Elon waving a chainsaw about and a measles outbreak in Texas. This week.

Still preferable to having a woman in charge though eh?

Well considering you cannot even name 1 thing she accomplished as VP.

That?s funny I don?t recall you being so positive about when females have been PM in UK funny that.

[Mason89]

Well considering you cannot even name 1 thing she accomplished as VP.

That?s funny I don?t recall you being so positive about when females have been PM in UK funny that.

I wouldve voted for every one if Trump was the other option

They seem to have to prove themselves to you first before youd vote for one ahead of a r@pist

[InversneckieDob]

Well considering you cannot even name 1 thing she accomplished as VP.

That?s funny I don?t recall you being so positive about when females have been PM in UK funny that.

Am I following this right?
Because Harris in the role of VP (a role with a questionable level of influence on policy) accomplished little, Trump with his questionable....everything, including, but not limited to, the many policy and personality quirks listed in Mason's post, is a better option as "leader of the free world"(sic)?

That's what I'm getting from your argument but please correct me.