Crowley Sold to MK Dons

[LeftPeg_Pie]

They knew he was going from the start of the season. Plenty of time to find a ready made replacement, which we haven't done. Considering that signing players then hopefully selling on is the clubs policy in theory, why wasn't a replacement for DC sourced?

They knew there was interest. They had no idea MK would meet the asking price. There is a difference. If we got 400K in Jan for DC, that is wild.

I totally agree that we should have replaced DC more effectively and I actually think Whitaker has got a lot about him in that role; he was just very poor last night.

[queenslandpie]

They knew there was interest. They had no idea MK would meet the asking price. There is a difference. If we got 400K in Jan for DC, that is wild.

I totally agree that we should have replaced DC more effectively and I actually think Whitaker has got a lot about him in that role; he was just very poor last night.

Flashes of amazing and lots of awful. He might have a lot about him but blooding him in the second half of a potential promotion season is an interesting decision.

[LeftPeg_Pie]

Flashes of amazing and lots of awful. He might have a lot about him but blooding him in the second half of a potential promotion season is an interesting decision.

Absolutely agree on the second part of that. I think Grant was DCs obvious replacement, but he has not hit the heights either.