+ Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 60

Thread: World Happiness report

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Buying goods from Occupied Palestinian Territories is horrible, international law requires all countries to ban goods and services from illegal Israeli settlements. Any chance this wine might choke you?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,136
    Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post
    Buying goods from Occupied Palestinian Territories is horrible, international law requires all countries to ban goods and services from illegal Israeli settlements. Any chance this wine might choke you?
    I have no interest in what you call 'international law', I won't be told what to do by some arsewipe, lefty, activist judges in Strasbourg or wherever, I'll make my own mind up whose goods and services I buy, and I quite deliberately seek out Israeli products whenever and wherever I can, especially Israeli Medjool dates, the best in the world and happily readily available in UK supermarkets.

    This afternoon, on my way home from my regular Flat White and Croissant in Holmes Mill, I'll be nipping into Byrnes to see what else they have available from Israel. They're usually stacked right next to the Lebanese wines, I'll have a couple of those, they are excellent as well.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,074
    Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post
    Buying goods from Occupied Palestinian Territories is horrible, international law requires all countries to ban goods and services from illegal Israeli settlements. Any chance this wine might choke you?
    There is nothing in either branch of ? international law? be it Public International Law or Private International Law that requires countries to ban goods and services, as you claim.

    Public International Law preserves the sovereignty of nations - so it is down the sovereign country to decide who it does or does trade with.

    The Republic of Bolton may have decided not to trade with Israel but clearly the Republic of Clitheroe has decided otherwise

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,136
    Quote Originally Posted by Swissclaret View Post
    There is nothing in either branch of ? international law? be it Public International Law or Private International Law that requires countries to ban goods and services, as you claim.

    Public International Law preserves the sovereignty of nations - so it is down the sovereign country to decide who it does or does trade with.

    The Republic of Bolton may have decided not to trade with Israel but clearly the Republic of Clitheroe has decided otherwise
    Thank you Swiss, it's good to know there's at least one International Lawyer I can trust, but then we always obey the law in the Ribble Valley.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    Thank you Swiss, it's good to know there's at least one International Lawyer I can trust, but then we always obey the law in the Ribble Valley.
    Good job mon ami because if Trump was over here you would not be able to access one...

    ?The first thing we do, let?s kill all the lawyers.?

    Donald Trump?s crusade against his opponent?s lawyers represents a new front in his war on the rule of law.

    In a series of moves that seem culled from the authoritarian playbooks of Tayyip Erdoğan, Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orb?n abroad, and that harken back to the dark days of McCarthyism and the second Red Scare here at home, Trump has slapped three prominent private law firms with longstanding ties to the Democratic Party with executive orders designed to impose crippling sanctions on their operations. The orders charge the law offices with ?weaponizing the judicial process? against Trump, and call for terminating their federal contracts; suspending the security clearances of at least some of their attorneys; and limiting their access to federal government buildings, presumably including courtrooms.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,136
    Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post
    Good job mon ami because if Trump was over here you would not be able to access one...

    ?The first thing we do, let?s kill all the lawyers.?

    Donald Trump?s crusade against his opponent?s lawyers represents a new front in his war on the rule of law.

    In a series of moves that seem culled from the authoritarian playbooks of Tayyip Erdoğan, Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orb?n abroad, and that harken back to the dark days of McCarthyism and the second Red Scare here at home, Trump has slapped three prominent private law firms with longstanding ties to the Democratic Party with executive orders designed to impose crippling sanctions on their operations. The orders charge the law offices with ?weaponizing the judicial process? against Trump, and call for terminating their federal contracts; suspending the security clearances of at least some of their attorneys; and limiting their access to federal government buildings, presumably including courtrooms.
    It's a war on lawfare, not the rule of law, the fact that a district judge can dictate the foreign policy of the USA is simply laughable, and is quite rightly being challenged. The Dems are facilitating the legal challenges to Trump's EOs through three particular law firms, each having as you say, 'long standing ties to the Democratic Party', so naturally a Republican government is going to withdraw their security clearance, they are not part of government, what do they need security clearance for ? I believe they've even withdraw Biden's as government has nowt to do with him any more, not that it had much to with him anyway in the last four years. Has anyone ascertained yet just who was running the USA while Biden rambled and sucked his thumb ?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,716
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    It's a war on lawfare, not the rule of law, the fact that a district judge can dictate the foreign policy of the USA is simply laughable, and is quite rightly being challenged. The Dems are facilitating the legal challenges to Trump's EOs through three particular law firms, each having as you say, 'long standing ties to the Democratic Party', so naturally a Republican government is going to withdraw their security clearance, they are not part of government, what do they need security clearance for ? I believe they've even withdraw Biden's as government has nowt to do with him any more, not that it had much to with him anyway in the last four years. Has anyone ascertained yet just who was running the USA while Biden rambled and sucked his thumb ?
    Probably the same lot that are manipulating Trump -----those with unbound wealth. It is the only way that Trump can survive after his bankruptcies etc.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Supersub6 View Post
    Probably the same lot that are manipulating Trump -----those with unbound wealth. It is the only way that Trump can survive after his bankruptcies etc.
    And please add outstanding criminal & civil cases.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •