+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 67

Thread: Is it really a good idea to make Hammy temporary?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2023
    Posts
    201
    Yeah 🤣 same which one! The one with nervous twitch, the one who cost us a million like some sick joke or the one more suited to being a gardener her spends that much time nose on the grass.

    The whole squad apart from a couple of young prospects have to go, and yes I'll include Haks and Humphreys

    Sibley and Jack Holmes only ones worth keeping !

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2024
    Posts
    818
    Apologies -I knew that would come back !

    I meant the tattooed one but I?d put hugehill in that lump category too.

    Hes no saint Nomby but hardly a lump 👍

  3. #13
    [QUOTE=MAMiller;40682640]Yeah 🤣 same which one! The one with nervous twitch, the one who cost us a million like some sick joke or the one more suited to being a gardener her spends that much time nose on the grass.

    The whole squad apart from a couple of young prospects have to go, and yes I'll include Haks and Humphreys

    Sibley and Jack Holmes only ones worth keeping ![/QUO

    Sibley and Holmes are league 2 at best.

    Sibley was petrified yesterday. Totally went to pieces

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,626
    Quote Originally Posted by caytonmiller View Post
    Desperate times calls for desperate measures.
    Personal thinks it's a huge risk giving it him short term never mind full time.
    it's a bit like bringing in Neil redfern imo. Some peeps are suited to youth/under 21 players. Others are lower league managers. Some are top notch man managers.
    I've always seen hamshaw in the youth managment roll. Wiles always spoke highly of hamshaw though don't recalling his name being mentioned by the senior pros. Though Viktor did speak highly of Warrington and the other keeper coach who went to Preston.
    Wiles/Hammy Rawmarsh connection?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,626
    Quote Originally Posted by caytonmiller View Post
    Warne has already been offered a job at one of SE old teams. He didn't need long to think about it and turned it down
    Gillingham.

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    Gillingham.
    Derby won?t be paying Warne compo then because it sounds as though he?s breached at least one clause in his confidentiality agreement

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,626
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    Derby won?t be paying Warne compo then because it sounds as though he?s breached at least one clause in his confidentiality agreement
    No, Gillingham approached him and probably said no instantly because of the agreement with Derby. Why would anyone risk losing a big pay out just for sitting at home? Just let the months pass and enjoy the pay off, then put yourself out there again if you're up to it.

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    No, Gillingham approached him and probably said no instantly because of the agreement with Derby. Why would anyone risk losing a big pay out just for sitting at home? Just let the months pass and enjoy the pay off, then put yourself out there again if you're up to it.
    Or it could just all be made up

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,626
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    Or it could just all be made up
    Indeed. Likes a good 'red herring' does Cayton

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2024
    Posts
    1,968
    Answer me one question if Warney/Barker can't take another job while June how come Hamshaw/Warrington can?

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •