Quote Originally Posted by Andy_Faber View Post
And I'll just add one thing, as it was me that rA was directing his anger at in recent posts

In post 3017, TTR suggested/implied something regarding Sith

In a later post from Sith, and many others from rA,the suggestion/implication had become a statement of fact ('saying')

There is a difference in definition and in law between implication and statement. I asked for an apology from TTR 'in general' for his tone, NOT for what he said, simply because he didn?t say it. In more litigious situations than our own 'tin pot forum' (copyright rA), TTR could have sued Sith and me (if I'd so accused him) and probably won

rA's most recent post now categorises TTR's outburst, correctly, as a suggestion/implication. So now we agree.

The issue of apologising isn't worth pursuing, the precedent of not apologising has been set and endorsed on both sides here many times, it's just the way it is.

I will however apologise to Madeline Bell for my comment the other day as she is still extant

End of from my POV and if the learned party here, GP, disagrees I'll accept
Sorry AF, but you do appear to have lost the plot on this one.

To suggest that Sith is somehow in the wrong is ludicrous and to try and deny that TTR suggested that Sith would want to ‘trash Jews’ similarly so.

Neither did I use the phrase ‘tin pot forum’ which you’ve made up. I described it as an ‘infinitely less significant little forum’ in comparison with some of today’s more major political ‘players’.

I think Sith is about the only person to have joined the forum under your ‘management’. He seems a very well balanced and moderate individual to me who is clearly upset at both the initial allegation and your handling of this whole issue. Time to sort it out and put things right.