Quote Originally Posted by Bohinen View Post
No-one suggested that, only the bookies odds, but they did appoint him as assistant head coach. Forget the BT nonsense, appointing a Wealdstone manager was the issue. Expansive football had taken them to 13th in the NL, and we beat them 6-1, away. Let the bros have the final word: neither results nor performances reached the levels we believe the team was capable of - particularly during the defining period towards the end.
Totally agree, the way we faded away was more than disappointing, we weren?t on our own and the squad available all season wasn?t great either.

My point is there?s a massive difference between him and Alves, to my knowledge Alves has no experience of managing Men?s football at any significant level and to my knowledge not any u23s at a higher level. Maynard was an educated punt and LW was, he had a relegation on his CV but the owners probably thought his work with Russell Martin put him in good stead and what they saw of SMs Wealdstone evidenced it might work, plus out of all the managers LW pitted himself against he recommended SM but Alves has zero experience.