+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 1254

Thread: O/T:- Trump Presidency 2.0 [hic sunt dracones]

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,399
    Quote Originally Posted by Jampie View Post
    Canadian defence spending is up to a whopping 1.37% of GDP... Your article doesn't specify a new target but presumably the already-committed 2% will be it. While you've every right of course to claim every last dollar of that is wasted (I strongly disagree, but hey we can't always agree on everything can we), there are obviously a lot of other spending priorities that are higher and eating your budget.

    I am also sceptical as ever of claims that trump's continual random mouthings-off are part of any kind of strategy whatsoever. If he was trying to get people to buy more US-made military gear he's failed miserably with his "pee off all of your allies and show the world you're an unreliable security partner" shtick. As evidenced by your article in which Carney declares buying so much US kit to be "not smart".
    While I will certainly agree that Trump is no grand strategist, I think there is some method to his madness. I think it is less the case that he is pimping for the US defence industry in particular, and instead pushing for a significant reduction in US military presence abroad. He has made no secret of his belief, right or wrong, that he thinks the US is footing the bill as world police and that he believes the rest of the west ought to step up in their stead. The outgoing NATO chief even recently praised Trump as having been responsible for a significant boost on NATO military spending among non-US states. And Trump has said he wants the same again.

    While Carney publicly says he wants to steer new funding away from US manufacturers, a claim that is met with much fanfare, what actually happens may well be different, as indicated by our proposed plan to give Lockheed Martin $5B for missiles that we will never fire, but may well give away for some lost cause.

    https://thedefensepost.com/2025/03/1...ocurement/amp/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,399
    As for the spending target, what Trump and Rutte are pushing for is 5% of GDP, as opposed to Canada’s current 1.37%. That’s almost quadrupling our defense budget.

    This is no small potatoes. Canada’s total government spending is around 40% of GDP. This would make military spending move to a whopping 12.5% of government expenditures instead of around the current 3.5%. That is no small potatoes. That would require a massive tax increases, massive debt or massive austerity. And as I said, I think we should have much more important priorities for things upon which to increase our spending.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •